Re: [gdal-dev] Improving details of the project build system and/or documentation

2023-05-29 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, >> Obvious candidates for >> standalone CMake projects would likely be for the few drivers that >> have proprietary dependencies (ECW, JP2KAK, MrSID, Oracle, ...) and >> aren't shipped by FOSS binary distributions. > (I don't follow 'and'; surely no FOSS binary distribution could have an

Re: [gdal-dev] Improving details of the project build system and/or documentation

2023-05-29 Thread Greg Troxel
Even Rouault writes: some thoughts on the thoughts from a packaging viewpoint. > - you definitely don't want to build all drivers (that can be built as > plugins) as plugins. This works (this is actually my dev setup, to > ensure that the core exports all the symbols needed for drivers > b

Re: [gdal-dev] WFS requests failing with /vsicurl/ against QGIS Server: missing Content-Length header

2023-05-29 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha
Hi Evan, Thank you for the prompted answer. I'm discussing this because I testing ogr2ogr node module and it adds (always) the /vsicurl/ prefix for any resource starting with http [1]. The point is /vsicurl/ can only be used with some http resources. My question was (but you already answered

Re: [gdal-dev] WFS requests failing with /vsicurl/ against QGIS Server: missing Content-Length header

2023-05-29 Thread Even Rouault
Jorge, Which error for which invocation of the WFS driver do you get ? Your below tries are already low level attempts. e.g the below invocation works for me without any error with GDAL master (in "ghcr.io/osgeo/gdal:alpine-small-3.7.0" Docker image too) ogr2ogr tmp.gpkg "WFS:https://irig-

[gdal-dev] WFS requests failing with /vsicurl/ against QGIS Server: missing Content-Length header

2023-05-29 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha
Hi, I'm getting errors with WFS calls to QGIS Server using /vsicurl/. Against Geoserver I didn't notice this issue. I can work on a solution, if the problem is on the QGIS Server side. I would love to have a second opinion on this. What I have found: 1) The is no Content-Length: header in

Re: [gdal-dev] Improving details of the project build system and/or documentation

2023-05-29 Thread Even Rouault
Now that the project has made it to CMake, I wonder if there is enthusiasm to break apart GDAL's build system to take advantage of its plugin capability in a default fashion to cut down on the massiveness of our default stuff-you-actually-want build situation. People rightly complain that li

Re: [gdal-dev] Improving details of the project build system and/or documentation

2023-05-29 Thread Howard Butler
> On May 28, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Sean Gillies wrote: > > Testing build systems is tough. I know GDAL can't test that all optional > drivers can be configured and built in isolation. At the same time, profiles > of drivers between the bare minimum and everything-but-the-kitchen-sink are > usef