If you have lots of Debian servers, what you can do is to use the Debian
experimental GDAL packages - which are usually up to date with the
latest version of GDAL - and to set up a Dockerfile to build these for
Debian stable and then to use reprepro to distribute them to your
machines. If you
ok, just pushed to https://pypi.org/project/GDAL/3.2.2.1/
Le 25/03/2022 à 23:24, snehal waychal a écrit :
Dear Evan,
Oh! thank you very much for a fast test release!
I can confirm that released version works as expected. And to be sure,
here is what/how I have tested:
```
$ doc
Dear Evan,
Oh! thank you very much for a fast test release!
I can confirm that released version works as expected. And to be sure, here
is what/how I have tested:
```
$ docker run -it python:3.7.13-slim-bullseye bash
$ apt-get update && apt-get install -y libgdal-dev gcc g++
# let's take
ok, I missed this was on the pypi package.
I've tried to make a patch over 3.2.2. For now, I've uploaded it only to
https://test.pypi.org/project/GDAL/3.2.2.1/ . Can you test that and
confirm that works properly ? If so, I'll push it to pypi official.
I've tracked the changes in a patch/3.2.
Dear Even, dear Bas,
Thank you very much for the quick response and highlighting the
Debian/Ubuntu release policy aspects. And also about the link to the
ubuntugis-unstable PPA.
>* what you discuss here is all about the patch & backport policy of the *
>* Debian GDAL package. You can try to fi
On 3/25/22 12:07, Even Rouault wrote:
what you discuss here is all about the patch & backport policy of the
Debian GDAL package. You can try to file a bug to Debian and point to
the patch you'd want to see backported, but I can't promise if there
would be interest in their maintenance team to c
Snehal,
what you discuss here is all about the patch & backport policy of the
Debian GDAL package. You can try to file a bug to Debian and point to
the patch you'd want to see backported, but I can't promise if there
would be interest in their maintenance team to create an updated package
wit
