Re: [gdal-dev] WFS Vector Layer Improvement

(Adding back the list again, please "Answer all") Le 29/08/2021 à 19:59, aharon david a écrit : Ok, you right. But what about to add it as an extention? Why to remove it by force? To avoid emitting confusing requests. As far as i can see in the code, other arbitary extenetions are permitted, w

Re: [gdal-dev] WFS Vector Layer Improvement

(Adding back the list) you can see in the following URL that typename\typenames are exist in the WFS2 schema examples: http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/2.0/examples/KVP/kvp.txt In those examples, Typename is just for GetFeature and Descri

Re: [gdal-dev] WFS Vector Layer Improvement

David, Per the standard (at least I checked in WFS 2.0), typename/typenames is not a standardized query parameter for GetCapabilities. Are you referring to some servers that would accept it as an extension ? Even Le 29/08/2021 à 08:06, aharon david a écrit : Hi, I want to suggest an  impro