Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.3.0beta1 available

2021-04-19 Thread Even Rouault
This is intended. All GDAL feature versions change at least some parts of the C++ ABI Le 20/04/2021 à 00:10, Greg Troxel a écrit : I locally updated pkgsrc from 3.2.2 to 3.3.0beta1, and it built ok (without python bindings; that's next). I noticed a shlib major version bump, which wasn't menti

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.3.0beta1 available

2021-04-19 Thread Greg Troxel
I locally updated pkgsrc from 3.2.2 to 3.3.0beta1, and it built ok (without python bindings; that's next). I noticed a shlib major version bump, which wasn't mentioned in NEWS. So I wonder if there is truly and ABI break and that should be noted, or if it shouldn't have been bumped, or something

Re: [gdal-dev] Registered Content-Type for VRT?

2021-04-19 Thread jratike80
Hi, Do you count ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro as self standing software or rather as applications that use GDAL? They read VRTs pretty well but for writing some developer tools are required https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/imagery/supported-raster-dataset-file-formats.htm. -Jukka Rahkon

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC80

2021-04-19 Thread Norman Barker
+1 Norman On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:49 PM Howard Butler wrote: > +1 > > Howard > > > On Apr 16, 2021, at 12:55 PM, Daniel Morissette < > dmorisse...@mapgears.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Daniel > > > > > > On 2021-04-16 10:50, Even Rouault wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I hereby motion to adopt RFC 80:

Re: [gdal-dev] Registered Content-Type for VRT?

2021-04-19 Thread Howard Butler
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 12:04 PM, Sean Gillies via gdal-dev > wrote: > > I haven't seen a VRT media type in the wild, nor is there one on > https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml. > > Maybe application/gdalvrt+xml? So application/gdalvrt+json could then still happen ;

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC80

2021-04-19 Thread Even Rouault
Sean, I think the intent here was to kill two birds with one stone. Do the reporting related to the maintenance sponsorship, and take advantage of that time to also give us a chance to hear from some users who don't necessarily track day-to-day GDAL activity through our usual channels. I thin

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC80

2021-04-19 Thread Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
Hi all, I was unable to comment on https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3682 until now. Sorry about that. I think we should consider removing the 2nd paragraph under "Advisory Board" to help keep the maintenance sponsorship and new feature development concerns separated. It would be enough, I think

Re: [gdal-dev] Registered Content-Type for VRT?

2021-04-19 Thread Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
I haven't seen a VRT media type in the wild, nor is there one on https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml. Maybe application/gdalvrt+xml? As far as I know, GDAL is the only software that plays VRTs, and probably the only software that ever can, considering the extensions and

[gdal-dev] Registered Content-Type for VRT?

2021-04-19 Thread Howard Butler
Is there a content being used in the wild for VRT? What would be a reasonable one to register? The scenario where I would find this useful is to have an application such as QGIS be able to register to open VRTs that were downloaded from a server. ___

[gdal-dev] GDAL 3.3.0beta1 available

2021-04-19 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I've prepared a beta1 of GDAL 3.3.0, hoping for RC1 next week. This beta1 is especially aimed at giving packagers a chance to adapt for the changes that have occurred in this cycle in the Python bindings area with moving of scripts in the source tree, and report about potential related is