[gdal-dev] Does GDAL 3.2 exist?

2020-10-30 Thread mmfuller
The GDAL docs for gdal2tiles [( https://gdal.org/programs/gdal2tiles.html](https://gdal.org/programs/gdal2tiles.html) ) says that: "MapML support is new to GDAL 3.2." But the latest version of GDAL I can find at https://gdal.org/download.html is 3.1.4. So are the docs referring to an as yet u

Re: [gdal-dev] RGDAL + sqlite3 = ld: cannot find -lsqlite3

2020-10-30 Thread Roger Bivand
I don't think this is a relevant list. R-sig-geo is a relevant list if you are subscribed. Both PROJ and GDAL are themselves built using libsqlite3, and PROJ used by GDAL and many drivers themselves need it. It isn't needed by rgdal directly, but there was a (short) period when the rgdal configure

[gdal-dev] RGDAL + sqlite3 = ld: cannot find -lsqlite3

2020-10-30 Thread Doug Niven
I’m hoping someone might be able to shed some light on how to fix the following message when installing ‘rgdal’: /opt/rh/devtoolset-8/root/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/8/ld: cannot find -lsqlite3 collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status GDAL, PROJ, GEOS, Postgres 9-11, all installed vi

Re: [gdal-dev] Geoid read performance

2020-10-30 Thread INT
> -Original Message- > From: Even Rouault > Sent: October 30, 2020 12:03 > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > Cc: Vautour, André (INT) > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Geoid read performance > > ---External Email--- > > On mardi 27 octobre 2020 17:17:28 CET Vautour, André (INT) wrote: > > Hi all

Re: [gdal-dev] Geoid read performance

2020-10-30 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 27 octobre 2020 17:17:28 CET Vautour, André (INT) wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using GDAL to read some geoid files in order to do some vertical datum > transformations. The transformation engine I am using is done point by > point transformations and doing a grid lookup for each point, so th

Re: [gdal-dev] Reading a VRT file & overview usage

2020-10-30 Thread Even Rouault
Angus, > But the second command ignores the overviews and downloads the full > resolution imagery leading to very long download times. Is it expected > behaviour that all re-sampling methods except 'nearest neighbour' need to > request the full resolution data? Can't they apply the selected re-sam