[gdal-dev] GDAL 3.1.2 whether supported the binary distribution for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Hi All, please confirm GDAL 3.1.2 whether supported the binary distribution for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 if yes, kindly share us the download location Thanks, Kavitha ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/l

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal 3.1.2 installation in RHEL 7 , stuck with dependency installation. kindly help

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 14:08, Kavitha K wrote: > checking for SQLITE3... configure: error: Package requirements (sqlite3 >= > 3.11) were not met: > > No package 'sqlite3' found > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. >

Re: [gdal-dev] https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/DownloadingGdalBinaries not updated for gdal 3.1.2 for RHEL install

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 14:00, Kavitha K wrote: > > But the ELGIS link is missing with latest version under this description. > > One added suggestion: If there is dependency for the latest gdal version, > kindly include those dependency download location and detailed installation > procedure in

[gdal-dev] gdal 3.1.2 installation in RHEL 7 , stuck with dependency installation. kindly help

Hi All, export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig Step 1: gdal 3.1.2 [root@test-22 gdal-3.1.2]# ./configure configure: Bash completions not requested checking for PROJ >= 6 library... checking for proj_create_from_wkt in -lproj... no checking for internal_proj_create_from_wkt in -lproj... no

[gdal-dev] https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/DownloadingGdalBinaries not updated for gdal 3.1.2 for RHEL install

Hi All, We are looking for Gdal latest version 3.1.2 for RHEL. https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/DownloadingGdalBinaries not updated for gdal 3.1.2 for RHEL install This link is specified with " Enterprise Linux GIS (ELGIS)

[gdal-dev] OSM issue with a relation containing all fields from its children

> The relation in OSM is invalid. Thanks a lot for your answer. This is indeed what I thought, the lake is not related to the boundary in any way. > The member relation 5462089 is also invalid, it doesn't have a type and it has touching outer rings. You should probably ignore relations like