Re: [gdal-dev] Windows CI build times

2020-04-20 Thread Howard Butler
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 7:46 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 01:45, Mike Taves wrote: >> >> It seems that many projects have shifted from AppVeyor to AZP for >> performance benefits. > > Or GitHub Actions, which is an incarnation of AzP. Having done both GitHub Actions an

[gdal-dev] Help with finding residual error for a given GCP.

2020-04-20 Thread Hays Barrett
Hello all, I want to get the error for each GCP before warping so I can calculate the RMSE before georeferencing. With a list of GCPs, is it possible to get the eventual map location of each pixel coordinate to calculate the transformation error for each GCP? I have tried to use GCPsToGeoTrans

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp and gdaltransform are inconsistent

2020-04-20 Thread Pillio Zoltan
Thank you for all your quick answer. So the conclusion is I need a geogrid file to do it. Even Rouault ezt írta (időpont: 2020. ápr. 20., H, 12:06): > On lundi 20 avril 2020 01:08:15 CEST jratike80 wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > When it comes to gdalwarp I believe that this part of the documentati

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geotiff] libgeotiff 1.6.0 release soon

2020-04-20 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 20 avril 2020 13:39:50 CEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 4/20/20 12:15 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > In preparation for the upcoming GDAL 3.1.0 release, I intend to prepare a > > libgeotiff 1.6.0 release later this week. I believe things are in good > > shape, but if people want to give

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geotiff] libgeotiff 1.6.0 release soon

2020-04-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 4/20/20 12:15 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > In preparation for the upcoming GDAL 3.1.0 release, I intend to prepare a > libgeotiff 1.6.0 release later this week. I believe things are in good shape, > but > if people want to give it a quick try to master, that's welcome. Will there be an RC befor

[gdal-dev] libgeotiff 1.6.0 release soon

2020-04-20 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, In preparation for the upcoming GDAL 3.1.0 release, I intend to prepare a libgeotiff 1.6.0 release later this week. I believe things are in good shape, but if people want to give it a quick try to master, that's welcome. The major point w.r.t 1.5.0 is added support for the OGC GeoTIFF 1.1

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp and gdaltransform are inconsistent

2020-04-20 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 20 avril 2020 01:08:15 CEST jratike80 wrote: > Hi, > > When it comes to gdalwarp I believe that this part of the documentation > https://gdal.org/programs/gdalwarp.html is essential > > "Starting with GDAL 2.2, if the SRS has an explicit vertical datum that > points to a PROJ.4 geoidgrid

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp and gdaltransform are inconsistent

2020-04-20 Thread jratike80
I would like to add that the command that you used gdalwarp -t_srs EPSG:4326 -s_srs EPSG:2056 SWISSALTI3D_10_TIFF_CHLV95_LN02_2600_1196.tif test.tif of course must not alter the pixel values. There are other sort of single band raster files than DEMs and it would make no sense at all to apply dat

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp and gdaltransform are inconsistent

2020-04-20 Thread jratike80
Hi, When it comes to gdalwarp I believe that this part of the documentation https://gdal.org/programs/gdalwarp.html is essential "Starting with GDAL 2.2, if the SRS has an explicit vertical datum that points to a PROJ.4 geoidgrids, and the input dataset is a single band dataset, a vertical correc