Re: [gdal-dev] Windows CI build times

2020-04-16 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 01:45, Mike Taves wrote: > > It seems that many projects have shifted from AppVeyor to AZP for > performance benefits. Or GitHub Actions, which is an incarnation of AzP. > As you mentioned, some of the dependencies could be built and cached, > rather than using vcpkg. cac

Re: [gdal-dev] Windows CI build times

2020-04-16 Thread Mike Taves
Hi Even, Yes, I agree these times are way longer than they should take. It looks like Howard was investigating AZP: https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/tree/azp how is that going? It seems that many projects have shifted from AppVeyor to AZP for performance benefits. As you mentioned, some of the dep

[gdal-dev] Windows CI build times

2020-04-16 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I've been a bit frustrated lately by the time spent on the GDAL AppVeyor CI builds: roughly 50 minutes for each of the two configs we test, VS 2017 x86 and VS 2015 x64, which can cause huge delays in case of busy days with many pull requests etc. (those delays also impact PROJ since the