On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 22:30, Sean Gillies wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault
> wrote:
>>
>> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
>> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
>> the initial post of the ti
On 2020-02-10 4:56 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:
So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/iss
Hi Even,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we
> didn't
> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals
> in
> the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
>
I personally like nirvn_v2
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 01:56 Even Rouault
mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Saskatchewan.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe. I
On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:43:24 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:35:40 CET Edzer Pebesma wrote:
> > On 1/23/20 5:58 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > >> Thanks! Yes, with SRS->importFromUserInput("EPSG:3857"); etc this works
> > >> fine; I'm OK with the warning, I just don't see ho
Hi,
It does really work for others. I just verified with GDAL 3.1.0dev and 2.4.2
on Windows. Could you repeat the test carefully with the bare minimum
gdalwarp -dstalpha without_alpha.tif with_alpha.tif
If it does not work please arrange a reproducible test case for us by
telling how to get exa
Hi,
So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 , there'
