[gdal-dev] Confusion between OSM Open options USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING and OSM_USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING

2019-08-04 Thread Stephen Knox
Hi list, There seem to be inconsistencies between the code, the API docs and error messages about whether the correct parameter name is USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING or OSM_USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING. I assume from the docs that it is USE_CUSTOM_INDEXING, so was planning to make a pull request to ensure the docs

Re: [gdal-dev] Wkt single precision float point

2019-08-04 Thread Nicolas Cadieux
Thank you! I read that document before sending the mail. Was wondering if it could have been specified elsewhere. In gdal ExportToWkt() exports with single precision with 9 decimals? Can this be extended to 15? Merci Nicolas > Le 4 août 2019 à 13:52, Even Rouault a écrit : > >> On diman

Re: [gdal-dev] Wkt single precision float point

2019-08-04 Thread Even Rouault
On dimanche 4 août 2019 13:18:12 CEST Nicolas Cadieux wrote: > Hi, > > I’am I wrong or is the WKT format only a single precision float point? Is > there a standard that imposes this? Could this be changed to a double > precision float point or must I use GJSON for that? WKT is neither single or

Re: [gdal-dev] Wkt single precision float point

2019-08-04 Thread Andrew Bell
It's text. I don't believe there are any specific precision requirements for wkt. On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, 1:25 PM Nicolas Cadieux wrote: > Hi, > > I’am I wrong or is the WKT format only a single precision float point? Is > there a standard that imposes this? Could this be changed to a double > pr

[gdal-dev] Wkt single precision float point

2019-08-04 Thread Nicolas Cadieux
Hi, I’am I wrong or is the WKT format only a single precision float point? Is there a standard that imposes this? Could this be changed to a double precision float point or must I use GJSON for that? Thanks! Nicolas ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-de