Re: [gdal-dev] Python/SWIG Build Error

2019-01-16 Thread Andrew Bell
Seems the problem is in the python module build. I think I've been here before 😥 On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, 6:47 PM Andrew Bell Seems strange that configure would place other directories before the > location for the current source tree. Is this by design? Is there a way to > change the behavior? > >

Re: [gdal-dev] Python/SWIG Build Error

2019-01-16 Thread Andrew Bell
Seems strange that configure would place other directories before the location for the current source tree. Is this by design? Is there a way to change the behavior? On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, 6:22 PM Even Rouault On mercredi 16 janvier 2019 17:41:26 CET Andrew Bell wrote: > > I'm trying to build GDAL

Re: [gdal-dev] Python/SWIG Build Error

2019-01-16 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 16 janvier 2019 17:41:26 CET Andrew Bell wrote: > I'm trying to build GDAL master branch with the python wrappers and I'm > getting an error on OSX with clang: > > > > creating build/temp.macosx-10.7-x86_64-3.6 > creating build/temp.macosx-10.7-x86_64-3.6/extensio

[gdal-dev] Python/SWIG Build Error

2019-01-16 Thread Andrew Bell
I'm trying to build GDAL master branch with the python wrappers and I'm getting an error on OSX with clang: creating build/temp.macosx-10.7-x86_64-3.6 creating build/temp.macosx-10.7-x86_64-3.6/extensions gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code -DNDEBUG -g -f

Re: [gdal-dev] gml: handle geometry of nested objects

2019-01-16 Thread Martin Landa
Hi Even, st 16. 1. 2019 v 18:20 odesílatel Even Rouault napsal: > for complex GML features, use https://www.gdal.org/drv_gmlas.html thanks, will try. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ gdal-de

Re: [gdal-dev] gml: handle geometry of nested objects

2019-01-16 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, st 16. 1. 2019 v 18:16 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > Two geometries are missing: > > """ > -552916.13 -1200482.68 > -552916.08 -1200482.70 > """ Correction, it seems that GDAL takes the last geometry: POINT (-552916.08 -1200482.7) """

Re: [gdal-dev] gml: handle geometry of nested objects

2019-01-16 Thread Even Rouault
Martin, for complex GML features, use https://www.gdal.org/drv_gmlas.html Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-de

[gdal-dev] gml: handle geometry of nested objects

2019-01-16 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, it seems that GDAL skips geometry when reading nested objects. See [1]. ogrinfo -ro ~/Downloads/example.gml -al """ GRFeature(CIZI_Bod):0 gml_id (String) = CE-20190114-74D6E69478BD4640AAD0D0E780F28A0C OGC_ANGLE (Real) = 0.026859 OGC_ANGLE_uom (String) = radian typ (String) = A pop

Re: [gdal-dev] osx compile failure

2019-01-16 Thread Ivan Lucena
Alan, Did you used --without-libtool on ./configure? If you do that, I believe that the file ./apps/gdalinfo and all other executables will be real executables and the makefiles will call "install_name_tool" to register the libgdal.dylib on the executables. In that case DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH will

Re: [gdal-dev] Geoserver/gdal: large tif with multiple overviews - bug + workaround

2019-01-16 Thread Idan Miara
I'm using this python API, I didn't know theses tests which do help (as the python API is not as documented as the c++ API). I feel we're off topic here so I'll publish it soon in another thread in the gdal-dev list. Thanks! On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 13:36, Even Rouault wrote: > On mercredi 16 janv

Re: [gdal-dev] Geoserver/gdal: large tif with multiple overviews - bug + workaround

2019-01-16 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 16 janvier 2019 12:59:51 CET Idan Miara wrote: > Even, > Thanks for your pointer! > It does solve the problem for me! > > Andrea, > Thanks for you input! > Should I find the time to look into these issues I'll contact you. > > I'm working on a python wrapper for gdal translate/wrap/in

Re: [gdal-dev] vector representation in netcdf 4

2019-01-16 Thread Even Rouault
David, > > Thanks for sharing the updated sample product with srs info included. > > I was able to mimic you polygon formatting in the attached TEST.nc file. > Unfortunately I was not able to get the srs info captured in my shape file > when applying ogr2ogr. > I am using the same crs I used suc