(Just saw Jonathan's email)
That approach to `ids` makes sense to me. Let's try and get the current PR
merged and I'll submit that as a followup PR (I have a few other minor
changes I want to make too, but have been holding off since the current one
is too enormous as-is)
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 1
Thanks for the votes and kind words :)
I'd applied Kurt's super-minor wording suggestions but haven't added any
new sections (on fiona, extra examples, etc) yet. I'll try and incorporate
those changes in the next couple days.
Cheers
Craig
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 11:07 Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> To f
Hi Craig,
For my suite I've used pytest_make_parameterize_id to auto-create id's
using the first parameterised value as the id name if that parameter is
called "_" (just underscore - the Python convention for a throwaway
variable). It works really well, although would need some work for
backw
Hi Benjamin,
Very interesting to read that you have experimented in similar things and
of your positive experiences with flatbuffers.
Den mån 10 dec. 2018 kl 18:18 skrev Benjamin Stadin <
benjamin.sta...@bridging-it.de>:
> Björn,
>
> Interesting to see there is some progress in this area. We've
To follow on to Howard's comment about testing in python...
I'm looking forward to the day that GDAL can drop all python 2.x support
and testing!
And anyone working on C++ testing is welcome to the code here. I'll
happily donate it with a license change to GDAL (it's apache 2.0 right
now). You
On jeudi 6 décembre 2018 11:40:49 CET Craig de Stigter wrote:
> Hi
>
> I appreciate your comments on the pytest proposal and all the support to
> help get it this far. Given no actionable improvements have been suggested,
> and the feedback thus far seems encouraging...
>
> I move to adopt RFC 72
+1 Kurt
Awesome!! It's great to see that my work in
https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/tree/master/python is obsolete.
Some very minor suggestions:
- "Support testing under Python 2 & Python 3 (2.7+)" Move the (2.7+) to be
with Python 2.
- Mention that Fiona and Rasterio also use pytest
-
Thanks Even, answers inlined.
Den mån 10 dec. 2018 kl 13:19 skrev Even Rouault :
> Björn,
>
> > In my spare time I've been working on a vector file format called
> > FlatGeobuf (tentatively). The main reason, besides curiosity and
> learning,
> > I'm putting time into it is that I think shapefile
+1
I watched the ticket traffic and shuddered :) Thank you. GDAL's testing
probably predates five or six Python testing regimes/eras. I also have
the concern about GDAL's testing going through Python, but this RFC will
make it much easier for people to contribute and improve the story.
Congratu
On lundi 10 décembre 2018 20:11:33 CET Erik Heinz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I like to use geotiff files with UInt16 raster bands and scale/offset
> metadata for saving cm-resolution elevation data in an efficient way.
>
> In principle, this works well with gdal. As of version 2.3.2, however,
>
Hello everyone,
I like to use geotiff files with UInt16 raster bands and scale/offset
metadata for saving cm-resolution elevation data in an efficient way.
In principle, this works well with gdal. As of version 2.3.2, however,
gdalwarp seems to silently drop the offset and scale values. I'm incl
Got it, thanks for your quick response!
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 16:59, Even Rouault
wrote:
> On lundi 10 décembre 2018 16:29:09 CET Idan Miara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying unsuccessfully to save Int16 dataset with scale != 1.0 in
> GPKG.
> >
> > If I understand correctly the remark about "Ti
On lundi 10 décembre 2018 16:29:09 CET Idan Miara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying unsuccessfully to save Int16 dataset with scale != 1.0 in GPKG.
>
> If I understand correctly the remark about "Tiled gridded coverage data"
> here:
> https://www.gdal.org/drv_geopackage_raster.html
> I expect offset an
Hi,
I'm trying unsuccessfully to save Int16 dataset with scale != 1.0 in GPKG.
If I understand correctly the remark about "Tiled gridded coverage data"
here:
https://www.gdal.org/drv_geopackage_raster.html
I expect offset and scale for Int16 to be supported in gdal.
I tried to gdal_translate an
Björn,
> In my spare time I've been working on a vector file format called
> FlatGeobuf (tentatively). The main reason, besides curiosity and learning,
> I'm putting time into it is that I think shapefile still rules the
> read/query static data performance game, which is kind of sad, and probably
15 matches
Mail list logo
