Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

On jeudi 6 décembre 2018 11:40:49 CET Craig de Stigter wrote: > Hi > > I appreciate your comments on the pytest proposal and all the support to > help get it this far. Given no actionable improvements have been suggested, > and the feedback thus far seems encouraging... > > I move to adopt RFC 72

Re: [gdal-dev] vrt warping precision issues and tile offsets

Hi Even, Many thanks for looking into this and pushing a fix so quickly. Some follow up responses inline. D > On Dec 5, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > David, > > Ah, shouldn't have looked at this, as with all sub-pixel issues, it took me > hours to figure it out, but the good new

[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

Hi I appreciate your comments on the pytest proposal and all the support to help get it this far. Given no actionable improvements have been suggested, and the feedback thus far seems encouraging... I move to adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest. https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc72_pytest Ch

Re: [gdal-dev] vrt warping precision issues and tile offsets

David, Ah, shouldn't have looked at this, as with all sub-pixel issues, it took me hours to figure it out, but the good news is I managed to fix it: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1132 > > I build a vrt > =sharing

[gdal-dev] vrt warping precision issues and tile offsets

Hi list, I am seeing some sub-pixel inter-tile offsets in the output of warped vrt products. I am a big fan of vrt and use regularly, but this is the first time that I’ve noticed this issue. I am hoping that there is a simple workaround. I’ve isolated a simple test case from a larger project.