Re: [gdal-dev] Wiki page for WCS discussion and best practices created

Ari Jolma-2 wrote > jratike80 kirjoitti 13.11.2017 klo 15:39: > >> And I have >> >> - Materialized my 6 pixel test image into a GeoTIFF image in EPSG:4326 >> and >> >> - Published it with GeoServer so I could capture the DescribeCoverage >> document > > The URL of the server? I tend to use lo

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver work

Ari Jolma kirjoitti 14.11.2017 klo 17:41: I've got very close to being able to get valid data (visual comparison in QGIS) from various server types and WCS versions. I've documented the results here: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/WCS%2Binteroperability It seems that I need eight option fl

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

Hi Even, I have some follow up questions on Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs: * Is there a preferred/better INTERLEAVE if there is more than one band? * Is there a preferred tile blocksize? You have 512 in your examples. Are there any major trade offs between using 128, 256, 512, or 1024 for x and y bl

[gdal-dev] Impact of tile size on artifacts in JPEG-compressed Tiffs

I'd like to check my understanding of the impact of the tile size on JPEG-compressed geotiffs. I've been getting dark bands 4 or 5 pixels wide on the bottom and right edges of the image when manually creating large image tiles from a collection of smaller tiles. I'm using the common aggressive

Re: [gdal-dev] Windows MSVC exception handling model

On mardi 14 novembre 2017 20:04:18 CET Lucian Plesea wrote: > Is there a specific reason to use /EHsc and not /EHs for windows > compilation?The difference is that /EHsc, which is used now, tells the MSVC > that extern "C" functions can't throw exceptions. I am trying to use > libjpeg and use C++ e

Re: [gdal-dev] Wiki page for WCS discussion and best practices created

jratike80 kirjoitti 13.11.2017 klo 15:39: Ari Jolma-2 wrote I made a bold attempt to begin describing the fundamentals of coordinate systems in WCS and how those relate to the fundamentals of coordinate systems in GDAL. Ari And I have - Materialized my 6 pixel test image into a GeoTIFF imag

[gdal-dev] WCS driver work

I've got very close to being able to get valid data (visual comparison in QGIS) from various server types and WCS versions. I've documented the results here: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/WCS%2Binteroperability It seems that I need eight option flags to cover all cases. Mostly the problem

[gdal-dev] GDAL annual report

Hi, The OSGeo board requested a project status for GDAL. I've drafted https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/AnnualReport2016_first_half_2017 You're welcome to do edits. I'll also attend the next OSGeo board meeting (Nov 21st 14h UTC) on invitation of the board. If there are points you would want to c

Re: [gdal-dev] [OGC Portal] OGC Compliance Renewal Notification (Final Expiration Notice)

Update on the status of OGC renewals: Submission deadline is today. This issue is holding back GDAL passing the test: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-kml22/issues/14 The technical contact reported that this issue is now fixed and that the plan is to deploy the fix end of November. We have

[gdal-dev] Fwd: RE: [gdal 2.2.2] different result with gdal 2.1.0

CC'ing Vincent's latest answer -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] [gdal 2.2.2] different result with gdal 2.1.0 Date: mardi 14 novembre 2017, 10:04:51 CET From: Vincent BERNAT To: Even Rouault Even, Thanks for your reply. In fact, you were right : my dataset w