Hi All,
I was experimenting with the GetVirtualMemArray python bindings and I am
receiving a 'Received a NULL pointer.' error (windows)
Also, the tests virtualmem_{1..4} in appveyor are being skipped (and
they're rigged to skip if the platform is not equal to linux)
Are the VirtualMemArrays not
> You could try one of the following :
>
> /vsizip//vsicurl/
> https://gsfc-ngap-hyp3-product-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/547/S1B_IW_GRDH_1SDV_20
> 170903T223511_20170903T223539_007233_00CC06_E9A8-POEORB-24-RGB.zip?AWSAccess
> KeyId=AKIAIYGQSCGFDA6WYRIQ&Expires=1824498425&Signature=WkQJbs%2FE6vLttvAAY
Sure. But I mean: They should decide about and use S2 or whatever by default as
part of the new standard and create a reference implementation, if they were
serious about solving mentioned issues in practice.
Am 31.10.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Kurt Schwehr
mailto:schw...@gmail.com>>:
See also sp
Hello GDAL Developers,
I am having trouble using the /vsis3 or /vsicurl driver with S3 signed
links and can't find any details in the archive of this list. I have a
signed S3 link that is a zip file containing a variety of other files,
including a geotiff, which is what I'm really after. I woul
I'm trying to work with a tool that, in one of its functions, uses a set of
_gdal methods regarding pointers (e.g. ptrcreate, ptradd, ptrvalue, etc.),
but when I try to import the function it returns me:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'ptrcreate'
Doing a dir(_gdal) returns me a
Thanks for the quick response. I'm not using latest GDAL and was curious where
that multi-threading enabling was made ? Was it some where in GDAL code or
through an option in the openjpeg 2.3.0 API ?
Thanks
Noureddine Farah
From: Even Rouault
Sent: Tuesday, O
On mardi 31 octobre 2017 19:39:23 CET N. Farah wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> In http://gdal.org/frmt_jp2openjpeg.html under 'Thread Support' section
> there is the following:
>
> "Starting with GDAL 2.3, this multi-threading at code-block level is
> automatically enabled by GDAL".
>
>
> Was meant "Starti
Hi,
In http://gdal.org/frmt_jp2openjpeg.html under 'Thread Support' section there
is the following:
"Starting with GDAL 2.3, this multi-threading at code-block level is
automatically enabled by GDAL".
Was meant "Starting with OpenJpeg 2.3, ..." ?
If yes, was that enabling made in the 'OpenJ
>
> building 'osgeo._gdal_array' extension
> C:\msys64\mingw64\bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc.exe -fno-strict-aliasing
> -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fwrapv -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1
> -DNDEBUG -DNDEBUG -I../../port -I../../gcore -I../../alg -I../../ogr/
> -I../../ogr/ogrsf_frmts -I../../g
Hi list,
I am using mingw64 GCC to build gdal-2.2.2 and got the following error.
gdal-2.1.4. was built fine. and I couldn't find syntax difference in cpl_port.h
between gdal 2.2.2 and 2.1.4.
Thanks,
Shawn
building 'osgeo._gdal_array' extension
C:\msys64\mingw64\bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc.ex
See also space filling curves like the hilbert curve and Google's S2...
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Hl4KapfAENAOf4gv-pSngKwvS_jwNVHRPZTTDzXXn6Q/view#slide=id.i0
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Stadin, Benjamin <
benjamin.sta...@heidelberg-mobil.com> wrote:
> To me this proposal look
To me this proposal looks too complicated for practical application in it's
current form. I think the surface model (or a "default" model) and related
algorithms should be part of the proposal.
I needed to solve some of the problems they mention for our 3d rendering engine
(store vector data o
I too took that understanding from the text, Ari. I'll read the specs
later, but since they mention a lot Big Data and the raster <> vector
integration, I imagine it is akin to a geometry collection, but
encompassing a wider range of data types, and arranged in a pyramid/r-tree
-esque environment f
On 30 October 2017 at 23:14, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Trying to sum up my thoughts on this topic and answering to various points
> raised in this discussion thread:
>
> - I believe a relevant question to ask to ourselves would be:
> "imagine that GDAL would come without any build system at all, wha
On mardi 31 octobre 2017 07:47:50 CET Vincent BERNAT wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I was working with gdal 2.1.0 and i decide to update to 2.2.2
>
> I work on Centos.
>
>
> Everything is ok but on one image, i don't get the same result (and the
> result with 2.2.2 seems incorrect).
>
>
> One of
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> On mardi 31 octobre 2017 09:11:14 CET Rashad Kanavath wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jukka and Even for you reply.
>
> >
>
> > I am using otb to write gtiff image and using ExtendedFilename option in
>
> > otb, it allows me to pass creation options to
FWIW, more about CRS URLs and the CRS resolver:
http://external.opengeospatial.org/twiki_public/CRSdefinitionResolver/
-Peter
On 10/31/2017 12:04 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> On mardi 31 octobre 2017 08:58:24 CET Ari Jolma wrote:
>
> > Rasdaman writes SRS definitions such as
>
> > "http://ows.ras
On mardi 31 octobre 2017 09:11:14 CET Rashad Kanavath wrote:
> Thanks Jukka and Even for you reply.
>
> I am using otb to write gtiff image and using ExtendedFilename option in
> otb, it allows me to pass creation options to gdal.
> So for now, I write the image in otb without any extended filenam
On mardi 31 octobre 2017 08:58:24 CET Ari Jolma wrote:
> Rasdaman writes SRS definitions such as
> "http://ows.rasdaman.org/def/crs/EPSG/0/32633"; in WCS coverage
> descriptions. The URL returns a gml:ProjectedCRS XML. GDAL fetches the
> XML but then gives up in SetFromUserInput since it only expec
Hi Even,
31.10.17 1:14, Even Rouault пишет:
Hi,
Trying to sum up my thoughts on this topic and answering to various points
raised in this
discussion thread:
- I believe a relevant question to ask to ourselves would be: "imagine that
GDAL would come
without any build system at all, what is th
I had the domain name ajolma.net at some point and I kept there the
documentation of the Perl bindings. Now they are at arijolma.org. At
some point I let the name expire but I have not been very good at
changing it everywhere. It is still for example in
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/bran
Thanks Jukka and Even for you reply.
I am using otb to write gtiff image and using ExtendedFilename option in
otb, it allows me to pass creation options to gdal.
So for now, I write the image in otb without any extended filename stuff
and then add no_data by using GDALSetNoDataValue() in python.
I
Hello all,
I was working with gdal 2.1.0 and i decide to update to 2.2.2
I work on Centos.
Everything is ok but on one image, i don't get the same result (and the result
with 2.2.2 seems incorrect).
One of the most important difference is the result of the call of this function
:
GDALSugg
23 matches
Mail list logo
