Even Rouault kirjoitti 25.10.2017 klo 22:22:
On mercredi 25 octobre 2017 14:42:54 CEST Ari Jolma wrote:
> I'd like to first know / decide what would we mean by a
> "multidimensional raster"?
The current rasters handled by GDAL are already multidimensional
I was aiming at the 'multidimensio
John,
The issue is a wrong detection of the field type in the GeoRSS/Atom
driver, which I just fixed per
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/7108
There's no workaround, apart from grabbing a build with the above fix.
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
On mercredi 25 octobre 2017 14:42:54 CEST Ari Jolma wrote:
> I'd like to first know / decide what would we mean by a
> "multidimensional raster"?
The current rasters handled by GDAL are already multidimensional, with the
number of
dimensions being fixed to 2, and being 2 horizontal dimensions (X
I'm using ogr2ogr to convert an xml file (from Google sheets) to csv.
All is well except when there's a value like
1 two
then the conversion will clip throw out everything after the "1". I take
it that it sees a number and stops there.
I've got a workaround, but is there any way to tell
I'd like to first know / decide what would we mean by a
"multidimensional raster"?
What we now have as a raster is a dataset with one or more bands. The
bands represent the data dimension and thus there is one of those
(2D+1). Would we like to have more data dimensions? What Even sketches
bel
Hi
(top posting to clearly mark the start of a new thread)
> I too think that multidimensional raster support would be useful.
> Besides by drastically redesigning data structures, could we get there
> incrementally?
One difficulty is that there are 154 raster drivers that use the current data
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2017 um 01:17 Uhr
>Von: "Lucian Plesea"
>Betreff: RE: GDAL and ESRI Compact Cache
>
>Not the whole cache, but with some effort you can read each bundle as a single
>raster, as long as they are V2 compact bundles.
>
>The simplest method is to use the WMS driver. C
Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 20:23:
On mardi 24 octobre 2017 17:07:51 CEST Ari Jolma wrote:
> Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from
> well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to
> http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0.
>
> Thus, to
