Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Baumann
On 10/23/2017 05:31 PM, Ari Jolma wrote: > > > Peter Baumann kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 18:01: >> Hi all, >> >> splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free to >> contact me or my group for any sort of explanations sought (I am the spec >> writer >> of the coverages, a

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 23 octobre 2017 18:31:58 CEST Ari Jolma wrote: > Peter Baumann kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 18:01: > > Hi all, > > > > splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free > > to contact me or my group for any sort of explanations sought (I am the > > spec writer of the c

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Baumann
On 10/23/2017 05:20 PM, Ari Jolma wrote: > jratike80 kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 17:23: >> Ari Jolma-2 wrote >>> I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess >>> that's enough for some time. >> My personal opinion is that developing anything for WCS 1.x versions is >> was

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Baumann
On 10/23/2017 04:23 PM, jratike80 wrote: > Ari Jolma-2 wrote >> I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess >> that's enough for some time. > My personal opinion is that developing anything for WCS 1.x versions is > waste of time. WCS 2.x is much better standard and

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Ari Jolma
Peter Baumann kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 18:01: Hi all, splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free to contact me or my group for any sort of explanations sought (I am the spec writer of the coverages, admittedly). Note that the Coverage Implementation Schema (CIS)

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Ari Jolma
jratike80 kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 17:23: Ari Jolma-2 wrote I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess that's enough for some time. My personal opinion is that developing anything for WCS 1.x versions is waste of time. WCS 2.x is much better standard and it is quit

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Peter Baumann
Hi all, splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free to contact me or my group for any sort of explanations sought (I am the spec writer of the coverages, admittedly). Note that the Coverage Implementation Schema (CIS) 1.1 is out.  Maybe this is a good starter: http://

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread jratike80
Ari Jolma-2 wrote > I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess > that's enough for some time. My personal opinion is that developing anything for WCS 1.x versions is waste of time. WCS 2.x is much better standard and it is quite a lot different than 1.x. -Jukka Rahk

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Ari Jolma
Even Rouault kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 13:19: Hi Ari, It seems to me that the WCS driver could benefit from some love. That would be a good initiative! I could begin with the gdalinfo WCS:... to list the subdatasets. I guess that's enough for some time. In the wished feature list, I coul

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-23 Thread Even Rouault
Hi Ari, > It seems to me that the WCS driver could benefit from some love. That would be a good initiative! In the wished feature list, I could add: * improve test coverage, which is really low currently: https://rawgit.com/rouault/gdalautotest-coverage-results/master/coverage_html/frmts/wcs/wc

[gdal-dev] Using OpenEx() in C# with CSV file

2017-10-23 Thread Paul Meems
Hi List, I'm trying to read all fields in a CSV file. Using this command it is working: ogrinfo -ro -al -so test.csv -oo X_POSSIBLE_NAMES=Lon* -oo Y_POSSIBLE_NAMES=Lat* -oo KEEP_GEOM_COLUMNS=NO Now I need to do this in my C# application. Because I need to send -00 (open options) I cannot use Ogr.