> Is this a known and expected behavior of the VRT-format?
> I really want to keep using the vrt-file since it is only 700kb instead of
> the tiff-file which is 63MB and I will be doing more calculations later on,
> which also result in new files.
>
> If needed I can send my input files.
Please o
I'm using GDAL v2.1.3
I have a tiff file with this info:
Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFF
Files: Chlorofyl-index.tif
Chlorofyl-index.tif.aux.xml
Size is 5140, 6065
Coordinate System is:
PROJCS["WGS 84 / UTM zone 32N",
GEOGCS["WGS 84",
DATUM["WGS_1984",
SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137