Re: [gdal-dev] Motions: Promote 2.1.4RC1 and 2.2.1RC1 for release

2017-06-28 Thread Daniel Morissette
+1 Daniel On 2017-06-28 4:47 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, Motion 1: GDAL/OGR 2.1.4RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.4 release. Motion 2: GDAL/OGR 2.2.1RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.2.1 release. --- +1 to both: Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spa

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaladdo without explicit factors specified

2017-06-28 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 28 juin 2017 14:10:17 CEST Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure this must have annoyed a lot of people. When you run > gdaladdo, you need to specify the appropriate overview levels. Generally > you use power-of-two factors, but the question is then: what is the last > relevant

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaladdo without explicit factors specified

2017-06-28 Thread jratike80
Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure this must have annoyed a lot of people. When you run > gdaladdo, you need to > specify the appropriate overview levels. Generally you use power-of-two > factors, but the > question is then: what is the last relevant factor given the dimension of > m

Re: [gdal-dev] Adding "Constant width" to LWPOLYLINE objects for DXF driver

2017-06-28 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 28 juin 2017 15:40:50 CEST Nikolai Bezdna wrote: > Even, > > RawCodeValues field seems ok to me. > > 1. Should it be of JSON type or a plain string? Good question I'd hava said a plain string, unless we anticipate that comma might be a valid value. But JSon might also make sense. A

Re: [gdal-dev] Adding "Constant width" to LWPOLYLINE objects for DXF driver

2017-06-28 Thread Nikolai Bezdna
Even, RawCodeValues field seems ok to me. 1. Should it be of JSON type or a plain string? 2. Where in the code should I add this field it to use it later in DXF driver? Or is it already there? Sorry, not yet familiar enough with gdal codebase. Examining docs now. Nick > > On mardi 27 juin 2

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaladdo without explicit factors specified

2017-06-28 Thread Jeff McKenna
On 2017-06-28 9:10 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure this must have annoyed a lot of people. When you run gdaladdo, you need to specify the appropriate overview levels. Generally you use power-of-two factors, but the question is then: what is the last relevant factor given the dimen

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaladdo without explicit factors specified

2017-06-28 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Thoughts ? > /me likes :-) -- Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito

Re: [gdal-dev] Motions: Promote 2.1.4RC1 and 2.2.1RC1 for release

2017-06-28 Thread Jeff McKenna
On 2017-06-28 5:47 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, Motion 1: GDAL/OGR 2.1.4RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.4 release. Motion 2: GDAL/OGR 2.2.1RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.2.1 release. --- +1 jeff ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@l

[gdal-dev] gdaladdo without explicit factors specified

2017-06-28 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I'm pretty sure this must have annoyed a lot of people. When you run gdaladdo, you need to specify the appropriate overview levels. Generally you use power-of-two factors, but the question is then: what is the last relevant factor given the dimension of my file size ? I've a ready to co

Re: [gdal-dev] Motions: Promote 2.1.4RC1 and 2.2.1RC1 for release

2017-06-28 Thread jratike80
Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > Motion 1: GDAL/OGR 2.1.4RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.4 release. > > Motion 2: GDAL/OGR 2.2.1RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.2.1 release. > --- > > +1 to both: Even +1 to both. -Jukka Rahkonen- -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.

[gdal-dev] Motions: Promote 2.1.4RC1 and 2.2.1RC1 for release

2017-06-28 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Motion 1: GDAL/OGR 2.1.4RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.4 release. Motion 2: GDAL/OGR 2.2.1RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.2.1 release. --- +1 to both: Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___