Re: [gdal-dev] xtensor: C++ multi-dimensional arrays with broadcasting and lazy computing

2017-04-11 Thread Wolf Vollprecht
Hi, I am a core contributor to xtensor. We've greatly improved the library since this was posted! Maybe you want to have another look? And if you have questions, or ideas for a good use case for xtensor, let me know here or shoot us a message on gitter (gitter.im/QuantStack/Lobby) and we'll help

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Ari Jolma
11.04.2017, 13:28, Bas Couwenberg kirjoitti: On 2017-04-11 12:22, Ari Jolma wrote: 11.04.2017, 13:05, Angelos Tzotsos kirjoitti: Hi Ari, sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev This should do it. No. I tried that before (

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-11 Thread Peter Baumann
Hi all, Piero is right - what I said applies to the case that grid and CRS axes align - which addresses the vast marjotiy of cases in my experience. However, OGC coverages (to some extent CIS 1.0, more with CIS 1.1) can also address more complex cases (irregular grids, grids embedded in higher-dim

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
In that case, you are either using a ppa mixed environment (perhaps you use the postgres ppa?) or you are using a package that still depends on the upstream gdal version. On 04/11/2017 01:22 PM, Ari Jolma wrote: 11.04.2017, 13:05, Angelos Tzotsos kirjoitti: Hi Ari, sudo add-apt-repository pp

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2017-04-11 12:22, Ari Jolma wrote: 11.04.2017, 13:05, Angelos Tzotsos kirjoitti: Hi Ari, sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev This should do it. No. I tried that before (found it in my .travis.yml file...) and it pul

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Ari Jolma
11.04.2017, 13:05, Angelos Tzotsos kirjoitti: Hi Ari, sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev This should do it. No. I tried that before (found it in my .travis.yml file...) and it pulls in older version 1.10.0. Ari C

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Ari, sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libgdal-dev This should do it. Cheers, Angelos On 04/11/2017 11:05 AM, Ari Jolma wrote: 11.04.2017, 10:49, Bas Couwenberg kirjoitti: On 2017-04-11 09:30, Ari Jolma wrote: How could I pu

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Ari Jolma
11.04.2017, 10:49, Bas Couwenberg kirjoitti: On 2017-04-11 09:30, Ari Jolma wrote: How could I pull into travis the binaries of the latest released GDAL (now 2.1.3)? There seems to be experimental debian package https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libgdal-dev Does anybody have experience

Re: [gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2017-04-11 09:30, Ari Jolma wrote: How could I pull into travis the binaries of the latest released GDAL (now 2.1.3)? There seems to be experimental debian package https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libgdal-dev Does anybody have experience with them? OSGeo-Live includes these package

[gdal-dev] Binary of the latest released GDAL for travis?

2017-04-11 Thread Ari Jolma
How could I pull into travis the binaries of the latest released GDAL (now 2.1.3)? There seems to be experimental debian package https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libgdal-dev Does anybody have experience with them? Right now I'm pulling in the source code and building it in the overal

Re: [gdal-dev] [Geoserver-devel] GML lat-lon coverages and interoperability

2017-04-11 Thread Piero Campalani
​Hi Jukka,​ On 10 April 2017 at 16:56, wrote: > Andrea wrote: > > If there is no 1:1 correspondence between geographic and raster space > axis, then I see no other way but to use Function to explicitly correlate > the two. > How would you propose to proceed instead? > > Perhaps with offset vecto