[gdal-dev] even.roua...@spatialys.com

2017-01-25 Thread Kemal Ardıl Gülez
>> Hello all, >> >> I'm trying to read a WFS source. The GetFeature request to the WFS source >> returns rows in the form of: >> >> >> >> 120 >> 288 >> 40402578 >> Descripton >> 56945117 >> 158699 >> 804.67 >> 2 >> 2 >>

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 2.1.3RC1 for release

2017-01-25 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 2017-01-25 3:27 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.3RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.3 final release. +1 Daniel -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 http://evouala.com/ - Location Intelligence Made Easy _

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 67 : Null values in OGR

2017-01-25 Thread Ari Jolma
Even, In the RFC you write that for JSON OGR currently returns unset fields when a field does not exist and when it is null. However, in a simple test I wrote this JSON { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [ { "foo" : "bar" }, { "foo" : null }, { } ] } Opening that as a layer and rea

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 67 : Null values in OGR

2017-01-25 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi Even, Change is most welcomed, especially for WFS/GML. Would there also be changes required to the CSV driver given the new EMPTY_STRING_AS_NULL GDAL 2.1 open option? Cheers, Jeremy On 26/01/2017, at 7:54 AM, Even Rouault mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>> wrote: Hi, I've prepared a n

Re: [gdal-dev] Reading a WFS source with OGR: Most columns don't appear in results

2017-01-25 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 25 janvier 2017 18:35:03 CET Kemal Ardıl Gülez wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to read a WFS source. The GetFeature request to the WFS source > returns rows in the form of: > > > > 120 > 288 > 40402578 > Descripton > 56945117 >

[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 67 : Null values in OGR

2017-01-25 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I've prepared a new RFC regarding the handling of null values in OGR. https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc67_nullfieldvalues No implementation proposed yet at this stage. I want to check if the proposed design choices make sense. Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http:

Re: [gdal-dev] [gdal2tiles.py] python engineering

2017-01-25 Thread Grégory Bataille
You are completely right. Symbolic link. Don't know what I was thinking about at the time! On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 at 19:12, Kurt Schwehr wrote: > Gregory, > > Aside: A point of terminology, by hyperlink, I think you mean symbolic > link or hard link. >

Re: [gdal-dev] [gdal2tiles.py] python engineering

2017-01-25 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Gregory, Aside: A point of terminology, by hyperlink, I think you mean symbolic link or hard link. As a point of information, I'm using both python unittest and C++ gunit very effectively for GDAL. I do use bazel as the build system, but that doesn't

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 2.1.3RC1 for release

2017-01-25 Thread Tamas Szekeres
+1 Tamas 2017-01-25 9:27 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault : > Hi, > > > > Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.3RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.3 final > release. > > > > --- > > > > +1 Even > > > > -- > > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > http://www.spatialys.com > > ___

[gdal-dev] Reading a WFS source with OGR: Most columns don't appear in results

2017-01-25 Thread Kemal Ardıl Gülez
Hello all, I'm trying to read a WFS source. The GetFeature request to the WFS source returns rows in the form of: 120 288 40402578 Descripton 56945117 158699 804.67 2 2 http://www.opengis.net/gml/sr

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 2.1.3RC1 for release

2017-01-25 Thread Jeff McKenna
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.3RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.3 final release. +1 jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://list

Re: [gdal-dev] [gdal2tiles.py] python engineering

2017-01-25 Thread Grégory Bataille
ok, thansk for the pointers on the deployment side. I'll think about it --- Gregory Bataille On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > On mercredi 25 janvier 2017 05:48:00 CET Grégory Bataille wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > If I want to really spend some time for this utility, I

Re: [gdal-dev] [gdal2tiles.py] python engineering

2017-01-25 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 25 janvier 2017 05:48:00 CET Grégory Bataille wrote: > Hello, > > If I want to really spend some time for this utility, I'd like to do some > clean engineering around it. > What I'd like to do is: > > - split the script into several files (smaller, single purpose, ...) > --> can you c

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 2.1.3RC1 for release

2017-01-25 Thread jratike80
Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.3RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.3 final > release. > > --- > > +1 Even +1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Motion-Promote-2-1-3RC1-for-release-tp5304716p5304719.html S

[gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 2.1.3RC1 for release

2017-01-25 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.3RC1 is promoted to be the official 2.1.3 final release. --- +1 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman