Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-04 Thread esacree
Even, Thank you! Elaine -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/WMTS-Need-TileLevel-option-Servers-responding-with-bad-capabilities-tp5298089p5298533.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [gdal-dev] WMTS - Need TileLevel option Servers responding with bad capabilities

2016-12-04 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 30 novembre 2016 12:55:57 CET esacree wrote: > Question: Is it possible to get a TileLevel option added to the new GDAL > WMTS driver? > > Reason: WMTS servers at USGS and ESRI are returning XML Capabilities with > TileLevel 18 (Google) or TileLevel 19 (default028mm). The USGS help

Re: [gdal-dev] Why are fields required in osmconf.ini file?

2016-12-04 Thread jratike80
Brad Hards wrote >> Why is that so? Why do field names need to be predefined before their >> extraction from the .osm file? >> >> Why can't only those fields which already exist in the .osm file, be >> extracted? > How could ogr2ogr possibly know what fields are in the file? It would > require >