Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 65: IETF RFC7946 GeoJSON

+1 Daniel On 2016-10-29 9:02 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I move to formally adopt RFC 65: IETF RFC7946 GeoJSON https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc65_rfc7946_geojson The implementation has been committed into trunk the past days. --- Starting with my +1 Even -- Daniel Morissette h

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 65: IETF RFC7946 GeoJSON

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > I move to formally adopt RFC 65: IETF RFC7946 GeoJSON > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc65_rfc7946_geojson > > The implementation has been committed into trunk the past days. > > --- > > Starting with my +1 +1 Howar

[gdal-dev] 64 bit Gdal - .mdb file reading problem

Hi we need to read .mdb vector files using ogr. But it is not possible with 64 bit gdal java bindings. I have investigated all of the related posts and tried to apply proposed solutions but it not succeed . I have installed 64 bithttp://blog.codefluententities.com/2011/01/20/microsoft-access-da

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type

Thanks. From: Even Rouault Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:32:30 AM To: Ivan Lucena Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Johan de Braak Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type Le lundi 31 octobre 2016 14:24:44, Ivan Lucena a écrit : > Even, Are you p

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type

Le lundi 31 octobre 2016 14:24:44, Ivan Lucena a écrit : > Even, Are you planning to backport that? Done per https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6710 > > > From: gdal-dev on behalf of Even Rouault > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:29:27 AM > To: gdal-dev@lists.

Re: [gdal-dev] Dropping GeoPackage table doesn't reduce file size

Jerome, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:14 AM, jguelat wrote: > Thanks for you help! I thought this was done automatically... It is disabled by default: https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_auto_vacuum If you want to enable it through OGR, you can use OGR_SQLITE_PRAGMA: """ Starting with OGR

Re: [gdal-dev] Dropping GeoPackage table doesn't reduce file size

Thanks for you help! I thought this was done automatically... -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Dropping-GeoPackage-table-doesn-t-reduce-file-size-tp5293603p5293618.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [gdal-dev] Dropping GeoPackage table doesn't reduce file size

You must vacuum https://www.sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html. It can be slow so you do not necessarily want to do it if your database is big and if you dropped just a small table. ogrinfo db.gpkg -sql "VACUUM" -Jukka Rahkonen- -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gd

[gdal-dev] Dropping GeoPackage table doesn't reduce file size

Hi, I'm trying to drop a GeoPackage table using ogrinfo db.gpkg -sql "drop table test" (test is the only table in the GeoPackage). This seems to work and ogrinfo tells me that the GeoPackage is empty but the file size is the same as before (9.5 MB). Is this expected? I'm using GDAL/OGR 2.1.2 o

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type

Even, Are you planning to backport that? From: gdal-dev on behalf of Even Rouault Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:29:27 AM To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Cc: Johan de Braak Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type Le lundi 31 octobre 2016 11:11:

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type

Le lundi 31 octobre 2016 11:11:44, Johan de Braak a écrit : > Hi all, > > I cannot seem to find the possibility to set the output type in > gdal.RasterizeOptions (like in gdal.TranslateOptions). Am I missing > something or is this not possible? This was indeed a shortcoming. I've just added it in

[gdal-dev] gdal.RasterizeOptions output type

Hi all, I cannot seem to find the possibility to set the output type in gdal.RasterizeOptions (like in gdal.TranslateOptions). Am I missing something or is this not possible? I'm using GDAL 2.1.1 Thank you, Johan -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-Ras