Re: [gdal-dev] splitting other_tags from .osm file

2016-10-30 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 30 octobre 2016 18:04:56, jratike80 a écrit : > Hi, > > I apologize that I did not remember right what -all_tags is doing. The > difference is as written in http://www.gdal.org/drv_osm.html > > "Similar to "other_tags", except that it contains both keys specifically > identified to be

Re: [gdal-dev] splitting other_tags from .osm file

2016-10-30 Thread jratike80
Hi, I apologize that I did not remember right what -all_tags is doing. The difference is as written in http://www.gdal.org/drv_osm.html "Similar to "other_tags", except that it contains both keys specifically identified to be reported as dedicated fields, as well as other keys." Thus all_tags co

Re: [gdal-dev] splitting other_tags from .osm file

2016-10-30 Thread Andre Joost
Am 30.10.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Djordje Spasic: Jukka mentioned all_tags, of which I haven't been aware of. So my issue now is: what is the difference between other_tags and all_tags? other_tags includes all tags that are **not** covered by the attribute fields list in osmconf.ini. all_ta