Le lundi 03 octobre 2016 23:57:45, David Adler a écrit :
> Should the build succeed with the 2015 version of the MS compiler using
> x86? I get
>
> With x64 it gets a lot more errors.
>
> It works fine with VS 2010 x86 - haven't tried x64.
David,
Specify MSVC_VER=1900 on the nmake command line.
Should the build succeed with the 2015 version of the MS compiler using
x86? I get
With x64 it gets a lot more errors.
It works fine with VS 2010 x86 - haven't tried x64.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Le lundi 03 octobre 2016 17:49:34, Howard Butler a écrit :
> Even,
>
> I briefly looked at it the other day. My only nit was it seems a little
> confusing to have a GetNextFeature on both the Dataset and the Layer. Is
> one always better than the other? Which one should I use when? Should I
> alwa
Even,
I briefly looked at it the other day. My only nit was it seems a little
confusing to have a GetNextFeature on both the Dataset and the Layer. Is one
always better than the other? Which one should I use when? Should I always use
Dataset::GetNextFeature() and let it forward down to
OGRLaye
Thank you so much Even. It is working like a charm!
-Original Message-
From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com]
Sent: 30 September, 2016 01:05
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Francisco Javier Calzado
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Multithread deadlock
> I don't think this comes
If nobody has remarks on it, I'll call for a vote on this on Wednesday.
Even
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for discussion on "RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write
> capabilities" :
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc66_randomlayerreadwrite
>
> This RFC introduces a new API to be able to iterate
