Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_translate with -projwin possible bug

2016-07-26 Thread Rutger
Hey Lauren, I can replicate this with my Win64 installation of 2.1 (the conda-forge build). Thanks for the heads up, i also do this all the time. Not having to calculate the exact extent was one of the benefits of using projwin. The current behavior could probably also be achieved with gdal_warp

[gdal-dev] gdal_translate with -projwin possible bug

2016-07-26 Thread Lauren O'Brien
Hello all, I've noticed what I think may be a bug with gdal_translate, just looking for further information before deciding whether to report it. In version 1.11.4 and earlier, using the -projwin tag to subset a raster produces an output whose cell alignment and content matches the source dataset

[gdal-dev] Transforming rasters with the C API

2016-07-26 Thread Pablo Rozas Larraondo
Hello, I'm trying to transform a raster into a different projection using the public C functions exposed in gdal_alg.h I have some code that I have been testing using the functions GDALCreateGenImgProjTransformer() and GDALGenImgProjTransform(): https://gist.github.com/monkeybutter/8367132e9683a

Re: [gdal-dev] Time for a new GeoJSON driver?

2016-07-26 Thread Sean Gillies
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > The GeoJSON WG's draft-ietf-geojson, > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geojson/, is in the RFC > Editor > > queue and will be published soon. I'm considering whether adoption of the > > updated GeoJSON (registered

Re: [gdal-dev] gdalwarp -rpc with RPC_DEM default behavior not as described

2016-07-26 Thread Even Rouault
Patrick, Thanks for the report. It was indeed not working as documented. Fixed per https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6608 Even > Hi all, > > We've been making some orthos with gdalwarp (gdal version 2.1.1) and > encountering resampling errors in the output (gittery output in the lines > in ce

[gdal-dev] gdalwarp -rpc with RPC_DEM default behavior not as described

2016-07-26 Thread Patrick Young
Hi all, We've been making some orthos with gdalwarp (gdal version 2.1.1) and encountering resampling errors in the output (gittery output in the lines in certain spots). Long story short, explicitly setting the "-et" option to "0" fixed it, but the docs for gdalwarp say the following (under the -

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements

2016-07-26 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 2016-07-26 11:00 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I move to adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc63_sparse_datasets_improvements --- Starting with my +1 Even +1 on the overall idea and proposed solution. +0 on the implementation details as I'm

Re: [gdal-dev] Tickets that mention e00

2016-07-26 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 2016-07-26 9:17 AM, Even Rouault wrote: On Tuesday 26 July 2016 07:08:02 Jukka Rahkonen wrote: Hi, I wonder how likely it is that the tickets dealing with Arc/Info coverages http://www.gdal.org/drv_avce00.html will still receive some bug fixes. Would it be a big mistake to close them all as

[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements

2016-07-26 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I move to adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc63_sparse_datasets_improvements --- Starting with my +1 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mai

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_edit with ECW, parameter woes, documentation is probematic

2016-07-26 Thread Mark Johnson
Yes, that looks good. But also adapting the pages that use -co NAME=VALUE - such as http://www.gdal.org/gdal_translate.html -co "NAME=VALUE": Passes a creation option to the output format driver. Multiple -co options may be listed. See format specific documentation for legal creation options for

Re: [gdal-dev] (no subject)

2016-07-26 Thread Even Rouault
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 16:37:14 Hema Yeedunuri wrote: > aded images which uses wms services. I tried opening with > gdalopen it is not working . the output format supported in geoserver is > png / geotiff . but for a single band data the no. of bands i am getting > are 3 . and null data is coming.

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_edit with ECW, parameter woes, documentation is probematic

2016-07-26 Thread Even Rouault
Mark, I've tried to incorporate your feedback in this changeset: @@ -173,6 +173,16 @@ the PROJ, DATUM or UNITS with SetMetadataItem(), the later values will override the values built from the projection string. +All those can for example be modified with the -a_ullr, -a_srs or -mo switches +

Re: [gdal-dev] Tickets that mention e00

2016-07-26 Thread Even Rouault
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 07:08:02 Jukka Rahkonen wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder how likely it is that the tickets dealing with Arc/Info coverages > http://www.gdal.org/drv_avce00.html will still receive some bug fixes. Would > it be a big mistake to close them all as won't fix? Hi Jukka, unless a main

[gdal-dev] gdal_edit with ECW, parameter woes, documentation is probematic

2016-07-26 Thread Mark Johnson
While writing this, I figured put most of the problems, so this note will be more about suggestion in making the documentation more usable. I am going to receive an amount of ecw files that, for whatever reason, do not contain the georeferenced information. For the first image received, gdalinfo

[gdal-dev] (no subject)

2016-07-26 Thread Hema Yeedunuri
hi all , I have build gdal-1.11.2 with libcurl support to read wms layers.it is build sucessfully how can i read wms layers .I have geoserver on my loalhost.I have loaded images which uses wms services. I tried opening with gdalopen it is not working . the output format supported in geoserver is p

[gdal-dev] Tickets that mention e00

2016-07-26 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Hi, I wonder how likely it is that the tickets dealing with Arc/Info coverages http://www.gdal.org/drv_avce00.html will still receive some bug fixes. Would it be a big mistake to close them all as won't fix? -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ gdal-dev mailing list g