Tomaka,
I am using gdal with docker (https://hub.docker.com/r/homme/gdal/). I did not
build gdal by myself even if I am able to do it but I have to use a docker
container as we are in such infrastructure.
Anyway, using SDK 5.3 could be a solution if openjpeg lib is not fast enough.
Y.
On Fri
On Friday, July 22, 2016 10:28:15 Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
> Yves Jacolin free.fr> writes:
> > Jukka, I did not use two --config flags at the same time, but this
>
> information
>
> > is a great confirmation how to manage such multi config flag, definitively
>
> useful
>
> > for next time.
>
>
Yves Jacolin free.fr> writes:
>
> Jukka, I did not use two --config flags at the same time, but this
information
> is a great confirmation how to manage such multi config flag, definitively
useful
> for next time.
Hi Yves,
I was carefully reading your first mail which did have two --confi
All,
I've updated the proposed implementation and the RFC, mostly on improving
documentation based on the feedback of this thread.
One point I've had in mind, but didn't implement, is the possibility of having
a GetDataCoverageStatus() at the dataset level, in addition to the raster band
level
Yves,
Have you tried ECW JPEG 2000 SDK 5.2 or 5.3? Is there a reason why you are
still using old 3.3 version?
Every version of the SDK contains quite a few improvements and we would also be
interested in learning about the problems encountered in the supported version
of the ECW Jp2 SDK.
Th
Forgive me a newbie question but I'm not so familiar with the RFC process:
- Is there any kind of timescale for this appearing in trunk or what needs
to happen for that to happen?
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Call-for-discussion-on-RFC-63-Spars
Even, Jukka,
Thank both of you.
@Even, I though that I get this kind of issue :) I checked my formats list,
but maybe at the end of the day, my eyes were tired.
@Jukka, I did not use two --config flags at the same time, but this information
is a great confirmation how to manage such multi co