Yes I am finding it can be dependent on the input dataset dimensions - Im
only reproducing with a large raster. It is perhaps a small problem anyway
since apparently MapInfo will not handle files > 2GB anyway.
I will try using VSIFTruncateL to initialize.
On 13 July 2016 at 15:21, Even Rouault wr
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2016 15:41:36, jramm a écrit :
> jramm wrote
>
> > gdalwarp -of NWT_GRD -ot Float32 -t_srs EPSG:4326 test.tif test.grd
> >
> > very quickly returns
>
> Sorry this meant to read:
>
> very quickly returns:
>
> 0ERROR 1: /home/jamesramm/test.grd, band 1: IReadBlock failed a
jramm wrote
> gdalwarp -of NWT_GRD -ot Float32 -t_srs EPSG:4326 test.tif test.grd
>
> very quickly returns
Sorry this meant to read:
very quickly returns:
0ERROR 1: /home/jamesramm/test.grd, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0,
Y offset 0
ERROR 1: GetBlockRef failed at X block offset 0, Y b
I have a strange error when reprojecting a dataset to NWT_GRD format.
e.g.
gdalwarp -of NWT_GRD -ot Float32 -t_srs EPSG:4326 test.tif test.grd
very quickly returns
Stepping through, I've traced this to a call to `GetLockedBlockRef` in
IRasterIO (rasterio.cpp) which is called when GDALWarp att
Hi,
On behalf of the GDAL/OGR development team, I am pleased to
announce the release of the GDAL/OGR 1.11.5, 2.0.3 and 2.1.1 bug fix versions.
They contain respectively 24, 70 and 58 bug fixes since 1.11.4, 2.0.2 and
2.1.0.
The sources for 1.11.5 are available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/g
Le vendredi 08 juillet 2016 12:02:10, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Motions under vote:
> Motion 1: GDAL/OGR 1.11.5 RC1 is promoted to be the official 1.11.5 final
> release.
>
> Motion 2: GDAL/OGR 2.0.3 RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.3 final
> release.
>
> To replace the retracted mo
I can see where some similarities with other new and existing GDAL work could
be a blocker on this, but I also think this adds a a degree more flexibility
allowing potentially any kind of complex processing to be carried out
without worrying/bothering about boilerplate.
It would be good to find s
Peter,
I think 'Grid Algebra' would be what Ari Jolma is proposing here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc62_raster_algebra
As Even pointed out, there is some overlap, though my proposal is
technically very different.
The key differences I see are:
- Users can submit functions which operate on
