Re: [gdal-dev] Not able to build GDAL on RHEL_5 64 bit?

2016-06-24 Thread sablok
That worked thanks a lot :) -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Not-able-to-build-GDAL-on-RHEL-5-64-bit-tp5272915p5273284.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 24 juin 2016 22:55:03, Blumentrath, Stefan a écrit : > Hi again, > > And thanks for your swift reply. > > After removing the dust from my MSVC 2010 express, I managed to build the > trunk version of GDAL on Win 7 Pro (happy that I wrote down the build > procedure here: https://trac.os

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
> Should be fixed by r34419 > > Whole driver now backported to 2.1 Very cool! Thank you so much! ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
Hi again, And thanks for your swift reply. After removing the dust from my MSVC 2010 express, I managed to build the trunk version of GDAL on Win 7 Pro (happy that I wrote down the build procedure here: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/SOSI). The Windows build went fine too and I can now open

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Even Rouault
Stefan, > > Unfortunately, I did not see earlier that you fixed > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6503 in trunk. (Seems I have to add > myself to cc also for tickets reported by me, if I want to follow them?) Check that your email address is still defined in https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/prefs

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
> Just a remainder I intend doing RCs end of next week. > > Even Hei Even, Unfortunately, I did not see earlier that you fixed https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6503 in trunk. (Seems I have to add myself to cc also for tickets reported by me, if I want to follow them?) Not sure if I manage to

Re: [gdal-dev] Not able to build GDAL on RHEL_5 64 bit?

2016-06-24 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 24 juin 2016 19:13:56, sablok a écrit : > The options --without-sqlite doesn't work :( Sorry the correct name is --without-sqlite3 > and I am the point of > frustration now, even though I have all the libraries for sqlite3 in my > build path all the sqlite2 so's even tried changing t

Re: [gdal-dev] Not able to build GDAL on RHEL_5 64 bit?

2016-06-24 Thread sablok
The options --without-sqlite doesn't work :( and I am the point of frustration now, even though I have all the libraries for sqlite3 in my build path all the sqlite2 so's even tried changing the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable nothing works. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-or

Re: [gdal-dev] Not able to build GDAL on RHEL_5 64 bit?

2016-06-24 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 24 juin 2016 17:58:30, sablok a écrit : > What should one be doing if there is no option to move to RHEL_6, its kinda > strict requirement for my system? What about the options I suggested in https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2016-June/044633.html ? (anyway, in a few months,

Re: [gdal-dev] Not able to build GDAL on RHEL_5 64 bit?

2016-06-24 Thread sablok
What should one be doing if there is no option to move to RHEL_6, its kinda strict requirement for my system? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Not-able-to-build-GDAL-on-RHEL-5-64-bit-tp5272915p5273234.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: [gdal-dev] Next maintenance releases

2016-06-24 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Just a remainder I intend doing RCs end of next week. Even > Hi, > > Looking at https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/roadmap, I thought we could issue > RCs for 1.11.5, 2.0.4 and 2.1.1 for end of June. > As the transition to 2.X is well engaged in depending apps/libs, 1.11.5 > will probably be the l