Hi,
I've issued a new RC to fix a trunk regression in the logging of debug messages
(#6487). There are also a few other fixes that stacked up since RC3. I'll call
for a vote on it Wednesday if nothing serious pops up.
Updated archives :
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/2.1.0/gdal-2.1.0RC4.tar.x
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 10:00:39, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.0RC3 is promoted to be the official 2.1.0 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> No critical issue has been specifically reported on RC3 so far, so I invite
> PSC members to vote on this motion after doing your own testing and
>
Ticket here: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6487.
I haven't seen any other problems with 2.1.0rc3. Fantastic work, everyone!
Thanks,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Sean Gillies wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Even Rouault
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sean,
>> >
>> > I see something that l
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 17:45:20, Sean Gillies a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > > I see something that looks like a regression between the beta and rc3
> > > in
> >
> > my
> >
> > > Rasterio CI
> > >
> > > https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> >
> > I see something that looks like a regression between the beta and rc3 in
> my
> > Rasterio CI
> >
> > https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/rasterio/jobs/125120910#L1429
> >
> > That test was passing with the beta release. Any chanc
Hi Sean,
>
> I see something that looks like a regression between the beta and rc3 in my
> Rasterio CI
>
> https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/rasterio/jobs/125120910#L1429
>
> That test was passing with the beta release. Any chance of holding the
> release up for 60 minutes while I double check that
Hi all,
I see something that looks like a regression between the beta and rc3 in my
Rasterio CI
https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/rasterio/jobs/125120910#L1429
That test was passing with the beta release. Any chance of holding the
release up for 60 minutes while I double check that I'm just not bui
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
> wrote:
>
> Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.0RC3 is promoted to be the official 2.1.0 final release.
>
> +1
+1
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
ht
On 25/04/2016 13:02, Even Rouault wrote:
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 12:46:36, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
Dear developers,
building and testing latest 2.1.0 RCx on cygwin
enabling perl and python I hit some very curious build
issues:
1)
The configure requires that CXX is not defined for
building the py
On 2016-04-25 5:00 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.0RC3 is promoted to be the official 2.1.0 final release.
+1 jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
___
gdal-dev mailing list
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 12:46:36, Marco Atzeri a écrit :
> Dear developers,
>
> building and testing latest 2.1.0 RCx on cygwin
> enabling perl and python I hit some very curious build
> issues:
>
> 1)
> The configure requires that CXX is not defined for
> building the python swig system
> It seem
Dear developers,
building and testing latest 2.1.0 RCx on cygwin
enabling perl and python I hit some very curious build
issues:
1)
The configure requires that CXX is not defined for
building the python swig system
It seems a old issue not cygwin specific:
http://www.michael-joost.de/gdal_install
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.0RC3 is promoted to be the official 2.1.0 final release.
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
2016-04-24 17:58 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> I guess we would want to improve the shapefile importer to get the WKT
> definition from the GDAL EPSG DB when a AUTHORITY EPSG node is found. Could
> you
> create a ticket about that ?
Done: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6485
:Stefan
2016-04-24
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.1.0RC3 is promoted to be the official 2.1.0 final release.
---
No critical issue has been specifically reported on RC3 so far, so I invite PSC
members to vote on this motion after doing your own testing and validation.
Input from everyone else who can test it is also very wel
Le lundi 25 avril 2016 09:23:43, Tomer a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I sent this post again because it wasn't sent to the mailing list in the
> first time.
>
> I use c# bindings for GDAL and I want to read the column names of a gdb
> file.
> The problem is that if the column name is written with latin lett
Hi,
I sent this post again because it wasn't sent to the mailing list in the
first time.
I use c# bindings for GDAL and I want to read the column names of a gdb
file.
The problem is that if the column name is written with latin letters, e.g.
Arabic, I get gibberish with less characters than exp
17 matches
Mail list logo
