On my phone so can explain fully, but there are several blockers in GDAL
Library that prevent multi threading from being effective. Try using different
processes if it is completely required.
Blake Thompson
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Lorenzo Bottaccioli
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to pa
Hi,
I'm trying to parallelize a code for raster calculation with Gdal_calc.py,
but i have relay bad results. I need to perform several raster operation
like FILE_out=FILA_a*k1+FILE_b*k2.
This is the code I'm usign:
import pandas as pdimport osimport timefrom multiprocessing import Pool
df = pd.r
Passmore, James H. bgs.ac.uk> writes:
>
> I agree with all those that think that a request like
> http://myservice/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities&; should return
the highest supported
> version of WMS on that server (currently 1.3.0 but in the near? future
1.4.0 and then 2.0.0...). Th
Hello,
I would like to work on the defect listed under #6388 ( Get rid of the
remaining hard coded pi constants)
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6388
Also, if we're to remove the hard coded pi constants, shouldn't we also
remove the ln2 constants, as that too is defined under math.h?
Thank yo
I agree with all those that think that a request like
http://myservice/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities&; should return the
highest supported version of WMS on that server (currently 1.3.0 but in the
near? future 1.4.0 and then 2.0.0...). This is the expected behaviour
according the to
FYI
-- Message transmis --
Sujet : [OSGeo-Discuss] GSoC 2016: call for mentors
Date : mercredi 02 mars 2016, 18:03:31
De : Margherita Di Leo
À : "OSGeo-SoC" , OSGeo Discussions
Dear All,
Following the acceptance of OSGeo as mentor org also this year, we are now
recruiting m
I would concur with Ian and Jeff.
My experience of WMS servers is that those that say that they are 1.3.0 are
miss-configured or are just not following the standard well enough.
Not all of the WMS 1.3.0 servers are at fault but enough that it is safer
and less time consuming to default to 1.1.0.
Le samedi 13 février 2016 13:58:59, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This question
> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/180627/qgis-ogr-shp-to-tab-export-cr
> ashing-mapinfo-due-to-number-format-issues and a referred forum topic
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mapinfo-l/sO-wcp9bnuQ
To be clear, I personally don't have a problem with 1.1.1. My concern
is about version negotiation as a WMS client. I've seen users omit the
version and then when something doesn't behave as expected, they
manually (in a web browser) make a request as follows:
http://www.example.com?request=
Completely concur with Jeff. Everyone avoids 1.3.0 if they can help it.
1.1.1 is the de-facto standard version.
Mike
Michael Smith
US Army Corps
Remote Sensing GIS/Center
michael.sm...@usace.army.mil
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev on behalf of Jeff
McKenna
Date: Wednesday,
Hi Tim,
I can tell you just by use alone, the 1.1.1 standard is most prevalent.
In the MapServer world, it is 1.1.1 that dominates. I also find,
having been at this a long time now, that the 1.1.1 specification is
most likely to be supported, if WMS is supported at all, by other
mapping eng
There are lots of reasons to stick with 1.1.0 and few reasons to move to
1.3 so I would guess anyone who knows they want 1.3 will want to specify it
to be sure while naive users will be less suprised at getting a 1.0.0
version back if they haven't thought about it.
Ian
On 2 March 2016 at 13:58, T
Does anyone know why the WMS Driver defaults to version 1.1.1 instead of
1.3.0 by default? Does anyone have any objections with this changing to
1.3.0? It seems like 1.3.0 would fall more into line with the
specifications content negotiation.
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/trunk/gdal/frm
Dear GDAL developer,
I run this command (GDAL 2.0.2, released 2016/01/26)
ogr2ogr -f "ESRI Shapefile" Test2.shp OCI:user/pwd@instance -sql "SELECT RID,
ROUND(sdo_geom.sdo_area (s.geom, 0.01) / 1,4) SURF_HA, s.GEOM FROM SIG_SOCS
s WHERE RID IN (7778067,8644604)"
And I get
W
14 matches
Mail list logo
