Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 60: Improved round-tripping in OGR

+1 On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > Since no remarks have been done on the latest proposal, I move to adopt RFC > 60 : Improved round-tripping in OGR > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc60_improved_roundtripping_in_ogr > > Starting with my +1, > > Even > > -- > S

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 60: Improved round-tripping in OGR

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > Since no remarks have been done on the latest proposal, I move to adopt RFC > 60 : Improved round-tripping in OGR > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc60_improved_roundtripping_in_ogr > > Starting with my +1, +1 Howard _

[gdal-dev] gdalwarp

Dear List I have a compressed 4-band geotiff image with the 4th band being the Alpha channel. When I reproject this image to any other projection using gdalwarp or cut a a small window out of it using gdal_translate, all pixel values become 0 although in the original image they are not zeros.

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 60: Improved round-tripping in OGR

+1 The generalization of the initial GeoJSON-only proposal to other formats is a nice bonus and very well done, Even. Thanks! On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > Since no remarks have been done on the latest proposal, I move to adopt RFC > 60 : Improved round-tripping

[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 60: Improved round-tripping in OGR

Hi, Since no remarks have been done on the latest proposal, I move to adopt RFC 60 : Improved round-tripping in OGR https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc60_improved_roundtripping_in_ogr Starting with my +1, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com

Re: [gdal-dev] Promote debug msg to warning

Hi Even, One of our team members created a ticket: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6199 Paul *Paul Meems * Release manager, configuration manager and forum moderator of MapWindow GIS. www.mapwindow.org Owner of MapWindow.nl - Support for Dutch speaking users. www.mapwindow.nl *We've st

Re: [gdal-dev] Antw: Re: Issues with GDAL compilation

Le mercredi 04 novembre 2015 11:21:31, Matthias Benedikt a écrit : > Perfect! > Replacing > > > #if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__x86_64__) > > with > > #if 0 > did the trick, thanks a million! I don't know if you're a C/C+ developer, but if so, perhaps you could provide a patch to detect th

Re: [gdal-dev] Antw: Re: Issues with GDAL compilation

Perfect! Replacing #if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__x86_64__) with #if 0 did the trick, thanks a million! >>> Even Rouault 04.11.2015 11:13 >>> Matthias, Plese remind to keep the list CC'ed. > I tried also with the latest version and --without-avx, here's the > result: > > > GDAL is now

Re: [gdal-dev] Antw: Re: Issues with GDAL compilation

Matthias, Plese remind to keep the list CC'ed. > I tried also with the latest version and --without-avx, here's the > result: > > > GDAL is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > > Installation directory:/path/to/src/gdal-2.0.1/build > C compiler: icc -g

Re: [gdal-dev] Issues with GDAL compilation

Le mercredi 04 novembre 2015 10:33:11, Matthias Benedikt a écrit : > Hi there, > I'm trying to get GRASS and all its components compiled from source on a > Scientific Linux 6.6. PROJ4, GEOS, netCFD and HDF5 are good to go, except > GDAL. What i did was: > > > cd /path/to/src > svn checkout https:

[gdal-dev] Issues with GDAL compilation

Hi there, I'm trying to get GRASS and all its components compiled from source on a Scientific Linux 6.6. PROJ4, GEOS, netCFD and HDF5 are good to go, except GDAL. What i did was: cd /path/to/src svn checkout https://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/branches/1.11/gdal gdal cd /path/to/src/gdal mkdir build CFL