No problems at least on the other side of bindings:
my $g = Geo::OGR::Geometry->new(
WKT=>'MULTIPOLYGON(((1 1,5 1,5 5,1 5,1 1),(2 2, 3 2, 3 3, 2 3,2
2)),((3 3,6 2,6 4,3 3)))');
my $h = $g->ForceToPolygon;
say $h->AsText;
say $h->As(Format=>'GeoJSON');
output:
POLYGON ((1 1,5 1,5 5,1 5,1
Hi,
I've updated the RFC text with the suggestions made during this discussion,
and added the proposed implementation. If nobody has further remarks, I'll
call soon for a vote for its adoption.
Even
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for discussion on "RFC 60: Improved round-tripping in OGR".
>
> http
Le lundi 02 novembre 2015 21:44:20, Ivan Lucena a écrit :
> Hi Even,
>
> It doesn't seems like we are talking about the same think.
I think we do talk about the same thing :-)
>
> A VSI handler is is not an GDAL/OGR driver, so I can't see how that would
> work.
Well, you can just pretend that
Le lundi 02 novembre 2015 20:58:59, Ivan Lucena a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
>
> What if we could build and distribute VSI handler as plugins?
>
>
> I developed a VSI handler that depends on other software, so I would rather
> not build the GDAL main library with that dependency and let the user
> d
I am reading a file geodb and trying to convert multipolygon to Polygon
OGRGeometry *pGeom = NULL;
OGRGeometry *pForced = NULL;
pGeom = pOGRFeature->StealGeometry();
if(pGeom != NULL)
{
Hi,
I´m using GDAL 2.0 on an installed osgeo live system, but it doesn´t
integrate fully in all programs. When I ask the terminal "gdalinfo
--version", the right Version 2.0.0 is mentioned. But in a Python script I
always get back the following:
print gdal.VersionInfo('VERSION_NUM')
--> 1110100
Hi,
I'm having trouble changing the axis order of geometry coordinates while being
transfered by ogr2ogr from a GML file to PostGIS.
I think I have read most of the relevant stuff about this...
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc20_srs_axes
http://www.gdal.org/drv_gml.html
http://trac.osgeo.org
I think keeping configure/aclocal.m4/etc in svn is a reasonably pragmatic
approach, autotools can be weird at times and is a barrier to people
getting started compiling with an extra driver or a patch or something.
We have SWIG bindings too, the same principle applies except it's 10x worse
than au
Le lundi 02 novembre 2015 10:56:40, Dr Rainer Woitok a écrit :
> Even,
>
> On Sunday, 2015-11-01 16:37:42 +0100, you wrote:
> > ...
> > As I said before, I'd rather suggest you use --with-static-proj4 instead,
> > which contrary to what its name suggest, does classic library linking
> > (dynamic o
Even,
On Sunday, 2015-11-01 16:37:42 +0100, you wrote:
> ...
> As I said before, I'd rather suggest you use --with-static-proj4 instead,
> which contrary to what its name suggest, does classic library linking
> (dynamic
> or static depending on what is available)
Am I understanding that corre
10 matches
Mail list logo
