Re: [gdal-dev] SIGPIPE missing due to not including signal.h

2015-11-01 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Patch applied: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/31286 On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Even Rouault writes: > > > Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:43:35, vous avez écrit : > >> I am building on netbsd-6 i386 with gcc 4.5.3. > >> > >> I got an error about SIGPIPE being

Re: [gdal-dev] json-c configure.in seems too complicated

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:53:22, Greg Troxel a écrit : > I am building on a machine where most dependencies are built with > --prefix=/usr/pkg; a few are in the base system with --prefix=/usr. I > have json-c installed in /usr/pkg. > > With svn trunk, configure found -ljson-c (because I had

Re: [gdal-dev] SIGPIPE missing due to not including signal.h

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
Even Rouault writes: > Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:43:35, vous avez écrit : >> I am building on netbsd-6 i386 with gcc 4.5.3. >> >> I got an error about SIGPIPE being undefined. The man page says that >> signal.h is required to be included, and posix agrees: >> >> http://pubs.opengroup.

Re: [gdal-dev] aclocal.m4 checked in

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
Even Rouault writes: > Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:47:12, Greg Troxel a écrit : >> Running 'svn status' after building. I see aclocal.m4 is modified. The >> changes are small, but it seems that generated files shouldn't be >> checked in, and configure isn't, so I would suggest svn rm acloca

Re: [gdal-dev] aclocal.m4 checked in

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:47:12, Greg Troxel a écrit : > Running 'svn status' after building. I see aclocal.m4 is modified. The > changes are small, but it seems that generated files shouldn't be > checked in, and configure isn't, so I would suggest svn rm aclocal.m4. > However, it was updat

[gdal-dev] json-c configure.in seems too complicated

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
I am building on a machine where most dependencies are built with --prefix=/usr/pkg; a few are in the base system with --prefix=/usr. I have json-c installed in /usr/pkg. With svn trunk, configure found -ljson-c (because I had passed LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS to configure), and found many other thing

Re: [gdal-dev] SIGPIPE missing due to not including signal.h

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:43:35, vous avez écrit : > I am building on netbsd-6 i386 with gcc 4.5.3. > > I got an error about SIGPIPE being undefined. The man page says that > signal.h is required to be included, and posix agrees: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functi

Re: [gdal-dev] results from building with -Werror on NetBSD

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 01 novembre 2015 17:29:02, Greg Troxel a écrit : > (I just checked out svn trunk and have built on NetBSD 6 i386, with only > a few small issues. I'm not entirely clear on whether I should be > filing bugs as some of the issues are a bit confusing. I'm sending > separate mails as the

[gdal-dev] aclocal.m4 checked in

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
Running 'svn status' after building. I see aclocal.m4 is modified. The changes are small, but it seems that generated files shouldn't be checked in, and configure isn't, so I would suggest svn rm aclocal.m4. However, it was updated recently so perhaps this is intended. diff for amusement: Index

[gdal-dev] SIGPIPE missing due to not including signal.h

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
I am building on netbsd-6 i386 with gcc 4.5.3. I got an error about SIGPIPE being undefined. The man page says that signal.h is required to be included, and posix agrees: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/signal.html I couldn't find an include of signal.h; the followi

[gdal-dev] results from building with -Werror on NetBSD

2015-11-01 Thread Greg Troxel
(I just checked out svn trunk and have built on NetBSD 6 i386, with only a few small issues. I'm not entirely clear on whether I should be filing bugs as some of the issues are a bit confusing. I'm sending separate mails as the issues are unrelated. The good news is that I didn't find any for

Re: [gdal-dev] Unable to compile Gdal under Cygwin

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le samedi 31 octobre 2015 18:44:43, Dr Rainer Woitok a écrit : > Even, > > it took me a while to get back to my Gdal project ... > > On Sunday, 2015-10-11 16:57:05 +0200, you wrote: > > ... > > Ah, yes I guess it comes from latest proj version where the soname was > > bumped. Well you can safely

Re: [gdal-dev] Warning-free builds :-)

2015-11-01 Thread Even Rouault
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2015 18:08:12, Even Rouault a écrit : > Le jeudi 29 octobre 2015 17:59:52, Greg Troxel a écrit : > > Even Rouault writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We've achieved an important and symbolic milestone that will mean > > > something to developers: most of our (Unix) builds are warnin