On 17 October 2015 at 06:14, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> What we have with autotest is super important.
No doubt.
> I've been trying to figure out how we take the first 17
> years of knowledge built up in GDAL and make keep going forward over the
> next couple decades.
A very interesting question.
>
On 17 October 2015 at 12:54, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le samedi 17 octobre 2015 00:25:45, Kurt Schwehr a écrit :
>> I personally like foo_, but m_ is fine. I worry about unexpected side
>> effects of changing member naming with private members. I don't think
>> there will be any if everything build
Le samedi 17 octobre 2015 00:25:45, Kurt Schwehr a écrit :
> I personally like foo_, but m_ is fine. I worry about unexpected side
> effects of changing member naming with private members. I don't think
> there will be any if everything builds, but I still worry.
There can be subtle effects inde
On 17 October 2015 at 00:25, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> I personally like foo_, but m_ is fine.
I personally too, but we should stick to what has already been used in GDAL.
> I worry about unexpected side
> effects of changing member naming with private members.
I don't suggest changing members visi
Hi,
I am using the GISInternals release-1800-x64-gdal-1-11-1-mapserver-6-4-1
and I run the SDKShell.bat.
Then I tried running the gdal_polygonize.py as is and I got the following
message:
-
C:\GEC\
