Hi guys,
I've got an interesting one - I have some GeoTIFF Files that I've converted
to EPSG:3857 from GeoStationary as follows:
# gdalwarp -tr 2000 2000 -co tfw=yes -t_srs epsg:3857 -te 10018754.17
-7361866.11 20037508.34 -0.00
/storage/sat_data/20150824/IDE00422.201508240100.tif
/storage/
Thanks a lot for you response Even
out.asc is clearly different on the two platforms (x86 and ppc64le).
On x86 the content is as follows:
ncols20
nrows20
xllcorner440720.
yllcorner3750120.
cellsize 60.
107 123 132 115 132 132 140 132
Le dimanche 23 août 2015 14:18:03, Andrea Peri a écrit :
> Hi Even,
>
> I just notice that in the page
> http://www.gdal.org/gdalinfo.html
>
> In the sample reported is write a bloc size of 512x16:
> >Band 1 Block=512x16 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Gray
>
> Should it be a typo error ?
There's no typ
Hi Even,
I just notice that in the page
http://www.gdal.org/gdalinfo.html
In the sample reported is write a bloc size of 512x16:
>Band 1 Block=512x16 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Gray
Should it be a typo error ?
A.
2015-08-23 11:40 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> Le dimanche 23 août 2015 11:28:21, Andr
Le dimanche 23 août 2015 11:28:21, Andrea Peri a écrit :
> Hi Even,
> thx for reply.
>
> So actually a tiff born to be used with vrt datasource be better if
> you was with a tile=128x128 instead of tile=1024x1024
> right ?
I guess that should help in most cases, but almost due to the reduced til
Hi Even,
thx for reply.
So actually a tiff born to be used with vrt datasource be better if
you was with a tile=128x128 instead of tile=1024x1024
right ?
A.
2015-08-23 10:51 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> Le dimanche 23 août 2015 07:43:03, Andrea Peri a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> I have a tiff tiled with t
Le dimanche 23 août 2015 07:43:03, Andrea Peri a écrit :
> Hi,
> I have a tiff tiled with tile size 1024 x 1024.
>
> When I try to build a vrt-datasource on it using the gdalbuildvrt.
> I see the result vrt file report a
> block of 128x128 instead of 1024x1024.
>
> I dont know if this is correct