There are so many items that I forgot to mention (thanks Jeremy for the
reminder!) :
* 64-bit integer fields and feature IDs :
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc31_ogr_64
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of the GDAL/OGR development team and community, I am pleased to
> announce the release of GD
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.0 final
> release.
I declare this motion passed with +1 from JukkaR, TamasS, HowardB, DanielM and
myself.
I'll proceed soon to renaming the RC as final and announcing it.
Even
Hi,
For those interested in parallelizing algorithms that generate a big dataset
(let's say a GeoTIFF), I've just committed in trunk an improvement to the
existing not-so-known-I-guess GDAL "api proxy" mechanism
(http://www.gdal.org/gdal_api_proxy.html) that was initially designed to deal
with
Le jeudi 18 juin 2015 17:51:20, Nicolas Cadieux a écrit :
> Thanks,
>
> That is good news.
>
> Is the buffer still at 16 mb? If so, why keep it this low?
Choosing a buffer size is always somewhat arbitrary. For example, it might
depend on if people are running only one instance of the utility,
Thanks,
That is good news.
Is the buffer still at 16 mb? If so, why keep it this low? Lidar is very
demanding even for the best rigs.
I will test out the algorithms and keep you posted on differences between nn
models. Will recompile if the buffer is still at 16 mg. I will also look at
t
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 19:00:45, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Le mardi 16 juin 2015 18:50:58, Nicolas Cadieux a écrit :
> > "As you're exploring new territories, I'd expect you to report how this
> > works ;-) "
> >
> > Report no 1:
> >
> > (Sharing how little I know but still trying to help:)
> >
>
Even Rouault wrote
> Le jeudi 18 juin 2015 16:35:37, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Spotted this from gis.stackexchange
>> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/151153/is-gdal-translate-ignori
>> ng-th
>> e-cpl-tmpdir-switch
>>
>> I repeated the test on Windows with GDAL 2.0 and it seems
Le jeudi 18 juin 2015 16:35:37, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Spotted this from gis.stackexchange
> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/151153/is-gdal-translate-ignoring-th
> e-cpl-tmpdir-switch
>
> I repeated the test on Windows with GDAL 2.0 and it seems indeed that using
> --config opt
Thanks for the temporary workaround - but it is for the server admin to
fix the issue.
Andreas
On 18.06.2015 16:27, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
No easy workaround on OGR side since the OGR GML driver will honour the
XML encoding indication to do recoding (f
Hi,
Spotted this from gis.stackexchange
http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/151153/is-gdal-translate-ignoring-the-cpl-tmpdir-switch
I repeated the test on Windows with GDAL 2.0 and it seems indeed that using
--config option in the beginning of gdal_translate command fails. Like it
would be cut
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
> No easy workaround on OGR side since the OGR GML driver will honour the
XML encoding indication to do recoding (from what it assumes to be
ISO-8859-1, but is UTF-8) to UTF-8...
Hi,
If you just need the data a non-OGR workaround is to save the GML on disk
Le jeudi 18 juin 2015 15:50:22, Andreas Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I want to transform a WFS to Postgis, using this WFS service:
>
> http://wms.zh.ch/NEKWMS with the layer
> "landwirtschaftliche-nutzungseignung"
>
> While this works fine, there seems to be an issue with encoding. German
> Umlau
Hi,
I want to transform a WFS to Postgis, using this WFS service:
http://wms.zh.ch/NEKWMS with the layer "landwirtschaftliche-nutzungseignung"
While this works fine, there seems to be an issue with encoding. German
Umlauts are not correctly displayed after the transformation. Is there a
way t
+1
After a bit of testing on with our applications.
George K. Watson
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Daniel Morissette
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Daniel
>
> On 2015-06-18 5:26 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>> Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
>>> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted
+1
Daniel
On 2015-06-18 5:26 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.0 final
release.
---
No critical issue has been reported on RC2 so far, so I invite PSC
members to vote on this motion afte
+1
Howard
> On Jun 18, 2015, at 7:01 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Tamas
>
> 2015-06-18 11:26 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.0 final
> > release.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > No c
+1
Tamas
2015-06-18 11:26 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.0 final
> > release.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > No critical issue has been reported on RC2 so far, so I invite PSC
> > members to
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 10:02:37, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.0.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 2.0.0 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> No critical issue has been reported on RC2 so far, so I invite PSC
> members to vote on this motion after doing your own testing and validation.
> I
18 matches
Mail list logo
