Re: [gdal-dev] Macintosh GDAL library looks for UnixImageIO framework in default location only?

My email should be in the GDAL installer readme. Anyways, yes, the whole batch of frameworks is set up for absolue paths. So not only does GDAL reference UnixImageIO (and SQLite3), when you compile an app linked to them, it will also link absolute paths to the frameworks. The standard way to c

[gdal-dev] Macintosh GDAL library looks for UnixImageIO framework in default location only?

I am using the GDAL 1.11 Complete build for Mac found here: http://www.kyngchaos.com/software/frameworks. I am installing my .app bundle in /Applications (or rather the user is installing it there via a drag-and-drop .dmg), and I don't want the user to have to install anything to /Library/Framewor

Re: [gdal-dev] Killing GME driver ?

Hi Even, Thanks for listening. :) It will make my life easier in the coming year. --Wolf On 26 January 2015 at 22:01, Even Rouault wrote: > Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 21:54:37, Wolf Bergenheim a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Let's not be hasty here. > > > > The GME driver will become more important n

Re: [gdal-dev] Killing GME driver ?

Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 21:54:37, Wolf Bergenheim a écrit : > Hi, > > Let's not be hasty here. > > The GME driver will become more important now that GME is going down, since > people will possibly be using the GME driver to migrate their data from GME > to what ever other service / platform the

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discusson on RFC 52 Strict OGR SQL quoting

Hi, I just check PostGIS. Create a table with name test.test in test schema. The result looks so: CREATE TABLE test."test.test" ( id serial NOT NULL ); Also, if schema name have spaces it'll be look like: "test test"."test.test". And what about other DBs? Best regards, Dmitry 26.01.

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discusson on RFC 52 Strict OGR SQL quoting

Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 21:49:21, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit : > Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes: > > Hi, > > > > This is a call for discussion on the new "RFC 52 - Strict OGR SQL > > quoting", based on an older ticket. > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc52_strict_sql_quoting > > > > Su

Re: [gdal-dev] Killing GME driver ?

Hi, Let's not be hasty here. The GME driver will become more important now that GME is going down, since people will possibly be using the GME driver to migrate their data from GME to what ever other service / platform they are moving to. I think we should still keep it around for one more year.

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discusson on RFC 52 Strict OGR SQL quoting

Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes: > > Hi, > > This is a call for discussion on the new "RFC 52 - Strict OGR SQL quoting", > based on an older ticket. > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc52_strict_sql_quoting > > Summary : > > This RFC proposes that OGR SQL enforces strict quoting rules

[gdal-dev] Killing GME driver ?

Hi, I just saw news here and there (*) that Google Maps Engine will be discontinued in January 2016 (couldn't find an official statement from Google however, apart from an email quoted by others...). So I was wondering if there was a point in keeping the driver in trunk or if it should be just

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discusson on RFC 52 Strict OGR SQL quoting

On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:47:25 +0100, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, This is a call for discussion on the new "RFC 52 - Strict OGR SQL quoting", based on an older ticket. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc52_strict_sql_quoting Summary : This RFC proposes that OGR SQL enforces strict quoting rules f

[gdal-dev] Call for discusson on RFC 52 Strict OGR SQL quoting

Hi, This is a call for discussion on the new "RFC 52 - Strict OGR SQL quoting", based on an older ticket. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc52_strict_sql_quoting Summary : This RFC proposes that OGR SQL enforces strict quoting rules for SQL literals and identifiers. Even -- Spatialys - Ge

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 18:12:30, Andre Joost a écrit : > Am 26.01.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Even Rouault: > > Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 16:25:04, Andre Joost a écrit : > >> BTW: creating polygons from closed lines is still not available in GDAL > >> or other osgeo command line tools? > >>

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Am 26.01.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Even Rouault: Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 16:25:04, Andre Joost a écrit : BTW: creating polygons from closed lines is still not available in GDAL or other osgeo command line tools?

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 16:25:04, Andre Joost a écrit : > Am 26.01.2015 um 15:29 schrieb Even Rouault: > > It seems the documentation matches the initial implementation but has > > been outdated by later changes. Indeed, > > ogr/ogrsf_frmts/dxf/ogrdxflayer.cpp contains > > > the following (disabl

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Am 26.01.2015 um 15:29 schrieb Even Rouault: It seems the documentation matches the initial implementation but has been outdated by later changes. Indeed, ogr/ogrsf_frmts/dxf/ogrdxflayer.cpp contains the following (disabled) code : The behaviour might have changed with the implementation of i

Re: [gdal-dev] building gdal: conflict with sqlite3 version

Dear Even, thanks for your answer, >> Under Ubuntu 14, 64bit, i have the python distribution anaconda installed >> in /opt/anaconda >> and want to use the environment >> /opt/anaconda/envs/py27 >> source activate py27 >> >> I need gdal with Esri FileGeodatabase support, > > With write support ?

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Le lundi 26 janvier 2015 15:18:43, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit : > Spotted from gis.stackexchange: > > http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/131765/ogr-dxf-closed-polyline-conve > rsion > > The DXF driver documentation claims that closed polylines from DXF are > converted into polygons but that does

Re: [gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Hiya, My first thought is that the documentation must change. If I had perimeter fence features on some agricultural fields, I would want the field feature to be a polygon but not the (closed) fence feature. Surely the flexible way to go is exactly what is currently happening. If a DXF user wa

[gdal-dev] Closed polyline from DXF as line or area?

Spotted from gis.stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/131765/ogr-dxf-closed-polyline-conversion The DXF driver documentation claims that closed polylines from DXF are converted into polygons but that does not seem to happen. By comparing the DXF snipped from stackexchange ENTITI