Hello,
A number of files is currenlty excluded from distribution by debian
because their license is unclear:
* gdal/data/cubewerx_extra.wkt: derived from definitions distributed
by Cubewerx, rights unclear. See
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2165
* gdal/data/ecw_cs.dat: Derived via much process
Hi,
This is not completely fresh news, but I just discovered it today while
looking at what was the current state of this: GDAL 1.11 has been acknowledged
as an official reference implementation of KML 2.2 by OGC for the 3 compliance
levels :
http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/deta
That worked. Building trunk allows me to see the non-spatial tables. I
guess the FGDB was made with ArcGIS 9.x then.
Thanks again,
Christy
On 17/11/14 09:38 AM, Christy Nieman wrote:
Thanks Even. I'm not sure which version of ArcGIS created the FGDB,
but I'll try building master and see if
Thanks Even. I'm not sure which version of ArcGIS created the FGDB, but
I'll try building master and see if it works.
Christy
On 17/11/14 09:36 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le lundi 17 novembre 2014 15:23:54, cnie...@dmsolutions.ca a écrit :
Hi all,
I did a little looking around, but was unabl
Le lundi 17 novembre 2014 15:23:54, cnie...@dmsolutions.ca a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I did a little looking around, but was unable to find anything about this.
> I have a File Geodatabase that I can read with the OpenFileGDB driver,
> and see all of the layers containing spatial data. However, I
Hi,
I have a grayscale tiff file and would like to remap a grayscale value
of 249 to white (255).
I used the following command:
nearblack -white -color 249 -near 0 -of GTIFF -o temp_white.tif temp.tif
and also tried
nearblack -white -color 249 -near 1 -of GTIFF -o temp_white.tif temp.tif
B
Hi all,
I did a little looking around, but was unable to find anything about this. I
have a File Geodatabase that I can read with the OpenFileGDB driver, and see
all of the layers containing spatial data. However, I seem to not be able to
see non-spatial tables. Is this expected?
Thank
Perfect! Thanks.
Did I get it right: If I want the polygon from an "AREA"-table I need to
explicit request the polygon geometry? From my point of view the point
geometry from an "AREA"-table is only there to join the attributes to the
polygons.
regards
Stefan
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Pir
