Super!
--
Paul Ramsey
http://cleverelephant.ca
http://postgis.net
On November 5, 2014 at 9:57:44 AM, Even Rouault (even.roua...@spatialys.com)
wrote:
Paul,
Thanks for your remarks
> My only concern/note here is with regard to the WKB type numbers for
> features with a Z. The RFC seems
Paul,
Thanks for your remarks
> My only concern/note here is with regard to the WKB type numbers for
> features with a Z. The RFC seems to say that the numbers for the curve
> types will be ISO numbers, while the numbers for the old SFS types will be
> the backwards compatible ones. This puts OGR
My only concern/note here is with regard to the WKB type numbers for features
with a Z. The RFC seems to say that the numbers for the curve types will be ISO
numbers, while the numbers for the old SFS types will be the backwards
compatible ones. This puts OGR into an ugly snaggletooth situation,
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 49: Curve geometries
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc49_curve_geometries
Below the summary :
"""
The current geometry model in GDAL 1.X makes use of points, lines, polygons
and aggregations of them (multipoints, multilines, multipolygons and geometry
