Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.11.1 RC1 Available for Review

2014-09-24 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 24 septembre 2014 23:25:19, Dmitriy Baryshnikov a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm looking the http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/Release/1.11.1-News and > not found the SXF bug, which I fixed (#5647). > I'll be nice to add this fix to 1.11.1 too. Dmitry, Yes, it is not mentionned since it is was

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.11.1 RC1 Available for Review

2014-09-24 Thread Dmitriy Baryshnikov
Hi, I'm looking the http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/Release/1.11.1-News and not found the SXF bug, which I fixed (#5647). I'll be nice to add this fix to 1.11.1 too. Best regards, Dmitry 24.09.2014 18:34, Even Rouault пишет: Hi, As announced, I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 1.11.1 release ca

[gdal-dev] Fwd: gdalwarp -r average bug?

2014-09-24 Thread Stephen Roecker
Out of curiousity the other day I compared the results of gdalwarp (-r average) against the raster R package aggregate(fun=mean) function for aggregating a raster to a coarser resolution. I was suprized how different the results of gdalwarp were from raster. When zooming in and manually averaging

[gdal-dev] gdalwarp sets nodata value for real data points

2014-09-24 Thread Jerl Simpson
I've noticed a problem when using gdalwarp to warp netCDF data sets to different resolutions. $ gdalwarp --version GDAL 1.11.0, released 2014/04/16 It also happens with: $ gdalwarp --version GDAL 1.9.2, released 2012/10/08 It makes no difference if I'm warping to a higher, lower or same resolut

[gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.11.1 RC1 Available for Review

2014-09-24 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, As announced, I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 1.11.1 release candidate (many 1's eh!). Please review and test. Peek up an archive among the following ones (by ascending size): http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/1.11.1/gdal-1.11.1RC1.tar.xz http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/1.11.1/gdal-1.11.1RC1.tar

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaldem definitions

2014-09-24 Thread Dominik Schneider
Thanks Even! Dominik Schneider o 303.735.6296 | c 518.956.3978 On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Le lundi 22 septembre 2014 01:45:16, Dominik Schneider a écrit : > > One correction, that should have said: > > TPI "the central pixel is assigned the absolute difference betwe

Re: [gdal-dev] gdaldem definitions

2014-09-24 Thread Even Rouault
Le lundi 22 septembre 2014 01:45:16, Dominik Schneider a écrit : > One correction, that should have said: > TPI "the central pixel is assigned the absolute difference between the > central pixel of a 3x3 window and mean of all pixels within the 3x3 window" Domink, here's the relevant part of the

Re: [gdal-dev] turn off Orthoimage layer for USGS topos

2014-09-24 Thread Even Rouault
Jian, I've analyzed the file and it has indeed a particular structure with its OptionalContentGroup and OptionalContentMembershipDirectionary, the PDF objects that define layers and their visibility rules. Would be difficult to explain here... I believe the file is correct (at least layer turni