Re: [gdal-dev] [RFC] [GDAL] Idea for GSoC, 2014

2014-03-14 Thread Chaitanya kumar CH
Kshitij, What is the performance of the proposed algorithms for very large rasters? If one of them is good with large images that's a cleaner choice without all the workaround with scaling the rasters. -- Best regards, Chaitanya Kumar CH On 15-Mar-2014 12:22 am, "Dmitriy Baryshnikov" wrote: >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Commit Access for Vincent Mora

2014-03-14 Thread Frank Warmerdam
+1 Frank On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Motion: Extend GDAL/OGR commit access to Vincent Mora. > > --- > > I'd like to make it easier for Vincent to maintain and improve the recently > committed OGR WaSP driver, without me being the bottleneck. He has > demonstrated > a

Re: [gdal-dev] [RFC] [GDAL] Idea for GSoC, 2014

2014-03-14 Thread Dmitriy Baryshnikov
Hi, I think we need to decide it here, not to create lot of proposals. The second idea is very interesting. Maybe it worth to create some common interface (or API) to add new methods BRISK, SURF, SIFT etc. You can develop you realisation of BRISK and demonstrate how-to one can use it via such

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Commit Access for Vincent Mora

2014-03-14 Thread Vincent Mora
On 14/03/2014 16:42, Even Rouault wrote: Motion: Extend GDAL/OGR commit access to Vincent Mora. --- I'd like to make it easier for Vincent to maintain and improve the recently committed OGR WaSP driver, without me being the bottleneck. He has demonstrated a good knowledge of OGR working, and go

[gdal-dev] Motion: Commit Access for Vincent Mora

2014-03-14 Thread Even Rouault
Motion: Extend GDAL/OGR commit access to Vincent Mora. --- I'd like to make it easier for Vincent to maintain and improve the recently committed OGR WaSP driver, without me being the bottleneck. He has demonstrated a good knowledge of OGR working, and good interaction with our community. Vincent

Re: [gdal-dev] [RFC] [GDAL] Idea for GSoC, 2014

2014-03-14 Thread Kshitij Kansal
Hello everyone Continuing the previous discussion, I would like to propose something and the community's suggestions are welcomed/needed. I can understand that this thread is a little old, so let me remind you that its regarding the automatic geo-referencer idea. The idea is also proposed on the G

Re: [gdal-dev] FWD: OGC seeks comment on revised GML in JPEG 2000

2014-03-14 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I'm also trying to read that - bp - too long document and I guess I should also read GMLCOV to make sense of it One thing among others that is not clear to me is if the coordinates of GML features that can be embedded in the GMLJP2CoverageCollection are expressed in pixel coordina

Re: [gdal-dev] FWD: OGC seeks comment on revised GML in JPEG 2000

2014-03-14 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Mateusz Łoskot loskot.net> writes: > Hi, > > I think this may be of interested within the GDAL community: > > http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/1965 Hi, First time ever I tried to send feedback to OGC. Let's see if my mail went through. I commented two issues: 1. It looks

[gdal-dev] FWD: OGC seeks comment on revised GML in JPEG 2000

2014-03-14 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
Hi, I think this may be of interested within the GDAL community: http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/1965 Best regards, -- Mateusz Łoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osg