I am trying to do a crazy "What if...?" climate model experiment that
involves changing the location of the poles. So, mind you, I am not merely
trying to change the coordinate display and use a rotated pole grid. I am
actually trying to locate the pole somewhere else (for instance, in
Australia),
Perhaps differences in the hdf driver between the two versions could
explain differences in output.
Try converting netcdf file to gtiff with gdal_translate (using one gdal
version), then try gdalwarp from that common gtiff file.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Th
>
>
> This is the problem step:
>
> gdalwarp -rcs -ts 8800 6600 -s_srs EPSG:32662 -t_srs EPSG:4326 temp.tif
> target.tif
>
> gdalinfo -mm -stats target.tif
>
> is showing that the range of values in the image are dramatically
> different on the two servers!
>
> summary old:
> Band 1 Block=880
Le samedi 08 mars 2014 10:02:09, Vincent Mora a écrit :
> Are maps better candidates for image compression than natural images ?
Interesting idea ! For lossless compression methods such as deflate, yes maps
will likely have a better compression ratio.
Even
--
Geospatial professional services
On 07/03/2014 19:49, Even Rouault wrote:
Le jeudi 06 mars 2014 20:50:45, Joaquim Luis a écrit :
Even,
Did not get it all. You want a method that allows you to tell between a
map and aerial/satellite image?
Yes exactly
I believe the k-means algorithm would produce quite good results on maps
a
