Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.10.0 Release Candidate 3 available

2013-04-18 Thread maning sambale
Dear Even, On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > #5056: OSM waterway One issue with adding waterway as lines is that the tag waterway=riverbank is usually for polygon and multi-polygons (relations). Is there a way within the osmconf.ini for instance to limit to a specific key:val

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.10.0 Release Candidate 3 available

2013-04-18 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi, Testing rpm binaries for openSUSE are available here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=libgdal&project=home%3Atzotsos%3AApplication%3AGeo repository: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tzotsos:/Application:/Geo/ As long as there is a final release this will repla

[gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.10.0 Release Candidate 3 available

2013-04-18 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I've prepared a third (and hopefully last) release candidate for GDAL/OGR 1.10.0. The fixes added since RC2 are : #5029: Fixed problem with JP2 write with ECW SDK 5.0 #5055: OSM driver: Too many members referenced #5056: OSM waterway #5057: Geocoder only reports geometry on first feature Pl

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.10 Issues with Geocing API and OSM Driver

2013-04-18 Thread Dennis Gocke
Great work Even. Yes, you are right with the BING service. I did not use the correct key. But perhaps it would be good to have some kind of error message in this case. Cheers, Dennis On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Le jeudi 18 avril 2013 16:04:50, Dennis Gocke a écrit :

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.10 Issues with Geocing API and OSM Driver

2013-04-18 Thread Even Rouault
Le jeudi 18 avril 2013 16:04:50, Dennis Gocke a écrit : > Thanks for the information Even. > > I have created two tickets related to the OSM Driver issues. > > > Regarding the problems with the geocoding services. > It isn't really query dependant. A specific service behaves the same for > all q

Re: [gdal-dev] MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread Etienne Tourigny
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Rutger wrote: > Hey, > > > Etienne Tourigny-3 wrote > > I use a similar command, without the -a_ullr argument > > And does it then capture the correct corner coordinates? If i run your > command it does assign the sinusoidal projection, but takes the pixel > coor

Re: [gdal-dev] MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread Rutger
Hey, Etienne Tourigny-3 wrote > I use a similar command, without the -a_ullr argument And does it then capture the correct corner coordinates? If i run your command it does assign the sinusoidal projection, but takes the pixel coordinates (eg 0-2048) as the corner coordinates instead of the sinu

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Promote 1.10.0RC2 for release

2013-04-18 Thread Daniel Morissette
+0.5 I didn't have a chance to test, but I am very supportive as everything seems right. On 13-04-16 1:39 PM, Even Rouault wrote: Motion: GDAL/OGR 1.10.0RC2 is promoted to be the official 1.10.0 final release. --- No issue has been specifically reported on RC2 so far, so I invite PSC members

[gdal-dev] R: Re: MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread laura0
If I try your command I get ERROR 1: Unable to compute a transformation between pixel/line and georeferenced coordinates for temp.tif.There is no affine transformation and no GCPs. Messaggio originale Da: ml-node+s1560n5047999...@n6.nabble.com Data: 18/04/2013 16.18 A: "laura0" Ogg:

Re: [gdal-dev] MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread Etienne Tourigny
I use a similar command, without the -a_ullr argument e.g. gdal_translate -a_srs '+proj=sinu +R=6371007.181 +nadgrids=@null +wktext' On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Rutger wrote: > Hey Laura, > > Since the MxD14.A2 products are already projected in the sinusoidal > projection there is no ne

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.10 Issues with Geocing API and OSM Driver

2013-04-18 Thread Dennis Gocke
Thanks for the information Even. I have created two tickets related to the OSM Driver issues. Regarding the problems with the geocoding services. It isn't really query dependant. A specific service behaves the same for all queries I tested. Anyway here is how it can be reproduced: MAPQUEST: se

Re: [gdal-dev] R: Re: MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread Rutger
Hey Laura, The coordinates you found seem to be geographic (latitude/longitude), not sinusoidal. The MOD03 file is still unprojected, sometimes referred to as a swath or granule. It contains the original sensor scans which dont yet have a defined projection. It should be used only with other, low

[gdal-dev] R: Re: MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread lauram...@iol.it
Hi Rutger, thank you for your reply. The metadata in the HDF show me these bounding box: EASTBOUNDINGCOORDINATE=36.5436731054265 NORTHBOUNDINGCOORDINATE=43.0619355408597 SOUTHBOUNDINGCOORDINATE=21.8438333503548 WESTBOUNDINGCOORDINATE=6.83616802377613 and the first test has been: gdal_translate -of

[gdal-dev] Retracting 1.10.0 RC2

2013-04-18 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I'm changing my vote to -1 because of the issue reported in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5029#comment:23 (a late regression that I've introduced in ECW/JP2ECW write support with SDK v5). I'd like to also investigate the issue raised with the OSM read support in http://lists.osgeo.org/pip

Re: [gdal-dev] 1.10 Issues with Geocing API and OSM Driver

2013-04-18 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Dennis Gocke : > Hi, > > I’ve encountered some issues. My tests are done with the latest 1.10 > version. > > The first issue is related to the new Geocoding API. Great work btw. > > When using the MAPQUEST_NOMINATIM or GEONAMES service only the first > feature in the resulting layer gets a g

Re: [gdal-dev] ECW support on Fedora Linux - error

2013-04-18 Thread tanasko
OK, how can I apply this patch? Please provide step-by step instructions. 2013/4/18 Jean-Claude Repetto [via OSGeo.org] < ml-node+s1560n5047904...@n6.nabble.com> > Le 18/04/2013 10:13, tanasko a écrit : > > I did everything according to the instructions from this link: > > > http://wiki.openstre

Re: [gdal-dev] ECW support on Fedora Linux - error

2013-04-18 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 18/04/2013 10:13, tanasko a écrit : I did everything according to the instructions from this link: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ECW#Howto_install_gdal_with_ECW_support The libecwj2-3.3-wcharfix.patch patch is missing on this page. ___ gdal-d

Re: [gdal-dev] MODIS reprojection

2013-04-18 Thread Rutger
Hey Laura, Since the MxD14.A2 products are already projected in the sinusoidal projection there is no need to warp using GCP's. Fitting a polynomial through some GCP's will always be less accurate then using the projection the data is already in. Somewhere in the metadata in the HDF there should

[gdal-dev] 1.10 Issues with Geocing API and OSM Driver

2013-04-18 Thread Dennis Gocke
Hi, I’ve encountered some issues. My tests are done with the latest 1.10 version. The first issue is related to the new Geocoding API. Great work btw. When using the MAPQUEST_NOMINATIM or GEONAMES service only the first feature in the resulting layer gets a geometry. The other features only repo

Re: [gdal-dev] ECW support on Fedora Linux - error

2013-04-18 Thread tanasko
I did everything according to the instructions from this link: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ECW#Howto_install_gdal_with_ECW_support gdalinfo --formats |grep ECW ECW (rw): ERDAS Compressed Wavelets (SDK 3.x) JP2ECW (rw+v): ERDAS JPEG2000 (SDK 3.x) 2013/4/18 lanufabi [via OSGeo.org] >

Re: [gdal-dev] ECW support on Fedora Linux - error

2013-04-18 Thread lanufabi
Hey tanasko, can you check whether your libecwj2 package includes libecwj2-3.3-wcharfix.patch ? From which repository did you install qgis + gdal? Please post the output of $ gdalinfo --formats |grep ECW Gr Fabian -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/ECW-support