I was looking at the API and it appears, that at least in principle a
multi-band dataset (and hence the associated input file) could have
bands with different data types since the type is a property of the
band, not the dataset. Does this actually happen "in the wild"? If so,
what file types su
Hi list,
With ogr2ogr commandline, I'm trying to convert a dgn v7 zero length line
to shp point type and nothing happens. Does anyone knows if is it possible
to do so?
Thanks in advance,
Luis Serra
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http
On 8 November 2012 21:49, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> I'm also wondering if we shouldn't introduce a macro to compute the version
> number, like
> #define GDAL_COMPUTE_VERSION(maj,min,rev, build)
> (maj*100+min*1+rev*100+build)
>
> so that tests can be written more naturally (the new version n
Le jeudi 08 novembre 2012 23:09:16, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> On 12-11-08 01:49 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> >> I appologise to Howard or others who have been tuning configuration
> >> logic for a 2.0 release.
> >
> > It depends on how they have tuned...
> >
> > We have a small technical detail to
On 12-11-08 01:49 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
I appologise to Howard or others who have been tuning configuration logic
for a 2.0 release.
It depends on how they have tuned...
We have a small technical detail to solve with 1.10 because of
# define GDAL_VERSION_NUM
(GDAL_VERSION_MAJOR*1000+GDAL_
> I appologise to Howard or others who have been tuning configuration logic
> for a 2.0 release.
It depends on how they have tuned...
We have a small technical detail to solve with 1.10 because of
# define GDAL_VERSION_NUM
(GDAL_VERSION_MAJOR*1000+GDAL_VERSION_MINOR*100+GDAL_VERSION_REV*1
Folks,
While I hate ".10" versions it is clear that I/we aren't yet doing the
2.0 "grand unification" and so I don't feel a 2.0 version is appropriate
given the nature of current work.
I had originally though to just hold off on the release for longer to
allow for 2.0 work to be done, but I hav
Concerning the stub implementations, there are a lot of examples where the
current api contains arguments, which are just stubs for future...
--
Lähetetty Nokia N9 -puhelimestani
Even Rouault kirjoitti 7.11.2012 21:45:
>
> RFC 39 (the layer algebra) does break the C ABI, I believe.
No, i
Le jeudi 08 novembre 2012 14:24:12, Etienne Tourigny a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I think it should be 1.10, I don't see any major difference with 1.9
> and no major api changes. I see it more like an incremental release
> than a major milestone.
Yes, exactly
>
> I recall some time ago a discussion abou
> Even, that's what I was afraid of... I think I will give it a try. Is there
> a preferred solution between sources from Subversion and the nightly
> snapshots?
up to you
> Second, do I understand it correctly that I need to 1) install GDAL from
> sources,
yes
> and 2) recompile PostGIS on thi
Dear James and Even,
Thank you for you fast answers!
James, I do have the raster properly referenced (at least from what I
understand). For example:
mydb=# SELECT st_georeference(rast) FROM myraster WHERE rid=1;
st_georeference
-
0.167000 +
0.00 +
0.000
Hi,
I think it should be 1.10, I don't see any major difference with 1.9
and no major api changes. I see it more like an incremental release
than a major milestone.
I recall some time ago a discussion about the unification of ogr and
gdal, and that goal still seems pretty far (unless I missed
som
12 matches
Mail list logo
