On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Looks valid WKB to me. See my interpretation :
>
> 01 -> wkbNDR
> 0600 -> wkbMultiPolygon
> 0700 --> 7 entities
> 01 -> wkbNDR
> 03(00) -> wkbPolygon
>
You're right. I didn't realize the wkbPolygon had a wkbNDR field as well.
I
Le samedi 31 décembre 2011 00:09:50, Hua-Ying Ling a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
> > Hum, I'll suggest you to check again. The BLOB format is WKB format
> > (unless you create explicitely a spatialite DB).
>
> The following is the SQLite data BLOB exported u
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hum, I'll suggest you to check again. The BLOB format is WKB format (unless
> you create explicitely a spatialite DB).
The following is the SQLite data BLOB exported using the command ogr2ogr -f
"SQLite" output.sql inputFile.shp
This is a M
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 23:29:18, Hua-Ying Ling a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I can't seem to find the documentation for the SQLite Geometry BLOB format
> created by ogr2ogr when I converted a Esri Shapefile to SQLite. I'm using
> the version included with FWTools247.
>
> It doesn't seem to follow th
Hi,
I can't seem to find the documentation for the SQLite Geometry BLOB format
created by ogr2ogr when I converted a Esri Shapefile to SQLite. I'm using
the version included with FWTools247.
It doesn't seem to follow the WKB format or the SpatiaLite BLOB format.
I'd like to to keep my app very
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 16:42:58, Maksim Sestic a écrit :
> Sorry to bother with this issue, but should I file this as a bug?
Actually, I didn't see the XML definition in your first email because my email
reader only displayed the raw text part, and not the HTML part.
Anyway... The issue is
Sorry to bother with this issue, but should I file this as a bug?
Regards,
Maksim Sestic
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/GDAL-WMS-stripes-offset-error-tp7119089p7138360.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 16:29:11, William Kyngesburye a écrit :
> No takers? Maybe a bug or feature request I need to add to the tracker?
Please create a ticket with data to reproduce
> Or fixed/changed in 1.9 already?
I don' think so
___
gdal-d
No takers? Maybe a bug or feature request I need to add to the tracker? Or fixed/changed in 1.9 already?On Dec 21, 2011, at 6:43 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:Is gdal_contour supposed to do this?I have a DEM projected from a latlong area to a conic with -dstalpha, so there are triangles of nodata
