Ivan Lucena pmldnet.com> writes:
>
> Hi All,
>
> RFC 36: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc36_open_by_drivername
>
> The goal of RFC 36 is to save processing time by telling GDALOpen what driver
to use, avoiding the
> driver-probing mechanism (Where all drivers are asked to checked if they
re
Le mardi 04 octobre 2011 04:52:09, Daniel Morissette a écrit :
> On 11-10-03 10:04 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> > I believe that is because it is hard to know if HFA:test.tif was really
> > something other than a request for the HFA driver. It could actually
> > be a file named "HFA:test.tif
Dani
Le mardi 04 octobre 2011 05:55:27, Chaitanya kumar CH a écrit :
> What happens when a user tries to open a file named "hfa:example_file.img"
> the current way when there is also a file name "example_file.img"?
That should be fine. Ivan's code is only triggered :
if ( oOpenInfo.bStatOK == false &&
What happens when a user tries to open a file named "hfa:example_file.img"
the current way when there is also a file name "example_file.img"?
What if we try to reorder the driver list according to the file extension?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Daniel Morissette
wrote:
> On 11-10-03 10:04 PM
On 11-10-03 10:04 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I believe that is because it is hard to know if HFA:test.tif was really
something other than a request for the HFA driver. It could actually
be a file named "HFA:test.tif" or it could be that another driver happens
to use the HFA: prefix to mean some
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Daniel Morissette
wrote:
> I like the idea, especially since it can increase performance in some cases.
> However unless I'm mistaken the proposed patch seems to fall back on the
> regular test-open loop when the GDALOpenInternal() call with the explicit
> driver na
I like the idea, especially since it can increase performance in some
cases. However unless I'm mistaken the proposed patch seems to fall back
on the regular test-open loop when the GDALOpenInternal() call with the
explicit driver name failed, no matter why it failed. e.g. I specify the
invalid
Ivan
Makes me wonder what kind of performance gain you could see with
mapserver on a layer with a large number of images to open.
Seems to me that a tileindex would be a good application of this.
Brian
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:02 -0500, Ivan Lucena wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> RFC 36: http://trac.o
Hi All,
RFC 36: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc36_open_by_drivername
The goal of RFC 36 is to save processing time by telling GDALOpen what driver
to use, avoiding the driver-probing mechanism (Where all drivers are asked to
checked if they recognize the file).
It works by adding the drive
Le lundi 03 octobre 2011 19:17:25, Duarte Carreira a écrit :
> Hi there.
>
> I'm having trouble using a SrcSQL tag in a vrt that connects to an ArcSDE
> feature class.
>
> If I use SrcLayer everything works.
>
> But if I remove SrcLayer, and add a SrcSQL with the simplest of queries
> (SELECT *
Hi there.
I'm having trouble using a SrcSQL tag in a vrt that connects to an ArcSDE
feature class.
If I use SrcLayer everything works.
But if I remove SrcLayer, and add a SrcSQL with the simplest of queries (SELECT
* FROM USER.TABLE1) I get errors in ogrinfo:
ERROR 1: SQL Expression Parsing E
hdam99 gmail.com gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using ogr2ogr to get data from a oracle view (11g2) to a gml (3.1) file.
> The gml file was created as expected even I got the ERROR1: ORA-04043:
> object blah does not exist errors.
>
> Why did I get those errors even though they are in th
Hi,
I'm using ogr2ogr to get data from a oracle view (11g2) to a gml (3.1) file.
The gml file was created as expected even I got the ERROR1: ORA-04043:
object blah does not exist errors.
Why did I get those errors even though they are in the database?
There are two views that I didn't have any
Hi Zhenyu Lu,
You need not install the plugin dll-s if you don't require the corresponding
functionality.
With regards to the dependent dll-s, you can use the -dev packages from
http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/ to compile your own versions using the
following steps:
1. Download the -dev package a
14 matches
Mail list logo
