Thanks Even,
Your answer has been a lot of help for me. I think I'll go with the command
line option for now, and take note of the AutoIdentifyEPSG() enhancement for
future references.
Thanks,
-Tony Na
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Identify-EPS
> Glad to hear any comment from you about all this.
Commited as per http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4269
Thanks !
>
> Sincerly your,
> Sandro Furieri
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 19:21:15, tony...@sybase.com a écrit :
> Hi fellow GDAL/OGR developers,
> I'm currently developing an OGR data provider module for Sybase SQLAnywhere
> database, which recently supports spatial features in it's version 12
> release. I have a question regarding the best wa
> I can confirm this fixed my problem. I mentioned $bounty$ before, and I
> meant it. $50 sound ok? Let me know (off list if you like) an address,
> and I'll get you a check. (although its u.s. dollars, looks like you
> are from France?) Got a wish list someplace?
Thanks for the offer, but I
Hi fellow GDAL/OGR developers,
I'm currently developing an OGR data provider module for Sybase SQLAnywhere
database, which recently supports spatial features in it's version 12
release. I have a question regarding the best way to evaluate the
equivalence between two Spatial Reference Systems. It
On 9/29/2011 11:28 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Selon Andy Colson:
On 9/29/2011 1:36 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 21:28:26, Even Rouault a écrit :
Le jeudi 22 septembre 2011 17:48:29, Andy Colson a écrit :
Hi List,
I'm using ogr2ogr to convert (and reproject) data from s
Selon Andy Colson :
> On 9/29/2011 1:36 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 21:28:26, Even Rouault a écrit :
> >> Le jeudi 22 septembre 2011 17:48:29, Andy Colson a écrit :
> >>> Hi List,
> >>>
> >>> I'm using ogr2ogr to convert (and reproject) data from shapefile to PG,
> >>
I'm using the GDAL 1.6.2 GDALPolygonize() function to convert a raster image
to vector format. I'm then saving that off to an ESRI Shapefile. The
resulting shapefile has a polygon with an inner ring (a hole). The
shapefile also has an additional polygon with an exterior ring the size and
shape
Hello GDAL/OGR devs,
I'm a developer at Sybase, working with the SQL Anywhere product. SQL
Anywhere (SA) is a light-weight but fully-featured RDBMS with particular
strengths in the mobility and embedded markets. SA version 12 (release in
2010) added spatial support modelled on the OGC/SQLMM sta
Patrick
from http://remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/mercator_2sp.html
"The difference between 1SP and 2SP formulations is that the initial
parameters are different: in 1SP you start from the longitude of natural
origin and the scale factor, while in 2SP you start from the longitude
of natural
On 9/29/2011 1:36 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 21:28:26, Even Rouault a écrit :
Le jeudi 22 septembre 2011 17:48:29, Andy Colson a écrit :
Hi List,
I'm using ogr2ogr to convert (and reproject) data from shapefile to PG,
if I use insert statements the null dates are not
On 9/29/2011 3:03 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
I have upgraded libgeotiff, PROJ.4 and GDAL with EPSG definitions
regenerated
from the EPSG 7.9 database. New "preferred datum shift selection" rules are
also in place which will give preference to 7 parameter datum shifts over
3 parameter datu
Dear All,
I'm trying to use gdal_calc.py to solve the following problem:
I have a time series of NDVI data as 8bit tiff files with different
BadData pixels (>50 and <250; this is the same for all layers) from
which I would like to calculate the mean.
(i.e. the same pixel might not be valid in al
Frank wrote:
> I have upgraded libgeotiff, PROJ.4 and GDAL with EPSG
> definitions regenerated from the EPSG 7.9 database. New
> "preferred datum shift selection" rules are also in place which
> will give preference to 7 parameter datum shifts over
> 3 parameter datum shifts are also in place caus
On 09/29/2011 10:54 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Selon Frank Warmerdam:
Frank,
There might be further actions needed as far as GDAL (and libgeotiff perhaps ?)
is concerned according to ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4223 : "Next
time the EPSG database is updated, note that a Krovak paramet
Selon Frank Warmerdam :
Frank,
There might be further actions needed as far as GDAL (and libgeotiff perhaps ?)
is concerned according to ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4223 : "Next
time the EPSG database is updated, note that a Krovak parameter has been renamed
(and renumbered)."
Best
Folks,
I have upgraded libgeotiff, PROJ.4 and GDAL with EPSG definitions regenerated
from the EPSG 7.9 database. New "preferred datum shift selection" rules are
also in place which will give preference to 7 parameter datum shifts over
3 parameter datum shifts are also in place causing a fair amo
17 matches
Mail list logo
