Re: [gdal-dev] [Projections] EPSG, proj.4, .prj files

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Meems
Thanks Even, The method importFromEPSG() and the EPSG file look like what I'm looking for. I'll investigate it further. Thanks, Paul *Paul Meems * Release manager, configuration manager and forum moderator of MapWindow GIS. www.mapwindow.org Owner of MapWindow.nl - Support for Dutch speaking

Re: [gdal-dev] VRT Derived Bands from Python?

2011-05-11 Thread Antonio Valentino
Hi Even, hi Knut-Frode, Il 11/05/2011 20:08, Even Rouault ha scritto: > Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 11:53:55, Knut-Frode Dagestad a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Derived Bands of the VRT format seems like a very powerful resource. >> From the tutorial (http://www.gdal.org/gdal_vrttut.html) it is clear >> that

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers

2011-05-11 Thread Tamas Szekeres
+1 Tamas 2011/5/11 Even Rouault > Hi, > > Motion: I move to adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions > of > OGR layers. > >http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc35_deletereorderalterfielddefn > > Starting with my +1 > > Best regards, > > Even > __

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers

2011-05-11 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On 11-05-11 10:41 AM, Daniel Morissette wrote: On 11-05-11 04:10 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc35_deletereorderalterfielddefn +1 Frank -- -

Re: [gdal-dev] Segmentation fault with debian install of gdal on MODIS hdf4 files

2011-05-11 Thread Even Rouault
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 21:24:21, Jonathan Greenberg a écrit : > Thanks, but I was hoping someone had seen this with the latest Debian > release. Follow-up question, if I were to uninstall gdal + all the > affiliated libraries/dependencies, what do I need to make sure I > remove? I'm noticing, at le

Re: [gdal-dev] [Projections] EPSG, proj.4, .prj files

2011-05-11 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 20:20:51, Paul Meems a écrit : > Hi List, > > We use GDAL with Proj.4 in MapWindow GIS. > We're currently in the process of upgrading to GDAL v1.8 > > We have some issues with projections in MapWindow. > We partially us GDAL methods and partially our custom ones. > We also

[gdal-dev] [Projections] EPSG, proj.4, .prj files

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Meems
Hi List, We use GDAL with Proj.4 in MapWindow GIS. We're currently in the process of upgrading to GDAL v1.8 We have some issues with projections in MapWindow. We partially us GDAL methods and partially our custom ones. We also are more and more working with EPSG codes with WMS and WFS. So we need

Re: [gdal-dev] VRT Derived Bands from Python?

2011-05-11 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 11:53:55, Knut-Frode Dagestad a écrit : > Hi, > > Derived Bands of the VRT format seems like a very powerful resource. > From the tutorial (http://www.gdal.org/gdal_vrttut.html) it is clear > that the Pixel Functions themselves have to be written in C, which is > probably

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal 1.8 tiff

2011-05-11 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 18:51:07, Julien Malik a écrit : > Hello list, > > I had a bad surprise today using the new gdal 1.8 package available in > ubuntugis-unstable : > > When linked both to tiff v3 and gdal 1.8, the GTIFF driver is disabled > with a warning appearing like : > > WARNING !

[gdal-dev] gdal 1.8 tiff

2011-05-11 Thread Julien Malik
Hello list, I had a bad surprise today using the new gdal 1.8 package available in ubuntugis-unstable : When linked both to tiff v3 and gdal 1.8, the GTIFF driver is disabled with a warning appearing like : WARNING ! libtiff version mismatch : You're linking against libtiff 3.X but GDAL

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers

2011-05-11 Thread Daniel Morissette
On 11-05-11 04:10 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc35_deletereorderalterfielddefn +1 Daniel -- Daniel Morissette http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional Ma

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers

2011-05-11 Thread Howard Butler
On May 11, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > Motion: I move to adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of > OGR layers. > >http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc35_deletereorderalterfielddefn > > Starting with my +1 +1 Howard___

[gdal-dev] VRT Derived Bands from Python?

2011-05-11 Thread Knut-Frode Dagestad
Hi, Derived Bands of the VRT format seems like a very powerful resource. From the tutorial (http://www.gdal.org/gdal_vrttut.html) it is clear that the Pixel Functions themselves have to be written in C, which is probably anyway best for performance. I also get the impression that the correspon

[gdal-dev] Geocentric 9603

2011-05-11 Thread mario santos serrano
I HAVE OBTAINED THE SOLUTION Hello everybody: I had one problem (read below) with a Geographic Transformation. I tried multiple choices but anything worked. I thought that I get the solution when tried this way: ogr2ogr -s_srs "+proj=utm +zone=30 +ellpse=intl +towgs84=-84,-107,-120,5,6

[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers

2011-05-11 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, Motion: I move to adopt RFC 35: Delete, reorder and alter field definitions of OGR layers. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc35_deletereorderalterfielddefn Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo