Re: [gdal-dev] Problem with gdal 1.8 -- segmentation fault on large image with gdaladdo

Seems to have done the trick, thanks Even. What's the new ceiling on image size for overview calculation? Steve On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > Stephen, > > this should be fixed now in SVN. > > This was indeed something wrong in a recent optimization in overview > com

Re: [gdal-dev] Problem with gdal 1.8 -- segmentation fault on large image with gdaladdo

Stephen, this should be fixed now in SVN. This was indeed something wrong in a recent optimization in overview computation. This could cause integer overflow, that was triggered when dealing with a dataset where width * height > 2 billion. Thanks for reporting ! ___

Re: [gdal-dev] Problem with gdal 1.8 -- segmentation fault on large image with gdaladdo

Stephen, I've just managed to reproduce your issue by creating a fake 6x6 3 band tif and running gdaladdo on it. Investigating... Le vendredi 31 décembre 2010 16:44:04, Stephen Mather a écrit : > Hi All, > Testing out gdal 1.8; really excited by > http://www.gdal.org/gdallocationinfo

[gdal-dev] Problem with gdal 1.8 -- segmentation fault on large image with gdaladdo

Hi All, Testing out gdal 1.8; really excited by http://www.gdal.org/gdallocationinfo.html. Below is a comparison of doing the same process in 1.7.3 and then 1.8dev, released 2010/01/19 $ gdaladdo --version GDAL 1.7.3, released 2010/11/10 $ gdalbuildvrt LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.vrt *.png